Did I Use the Right Approach for Conservation and Angular Velocity?

shaqtus
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need help with this question: http://img804.imageshack.us/img804/2278/unledsbg.jpg

For a, I got omega = 18.63 rad/s by using methods of conservation of energy. Can someone tell me if I did this right? If not, please help me out! To be honest, I thought I had to use conservation of momentum for this since it involves a collision, but its equations don't involve angular velocity.

Homework Equations



Conservation of energy/momentum

The Attempt at a Solution


a) omega = 18.63 rad/sec
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is not conserved. But angular momentum is.
 
So does that mean I find v by means of conservation of momentum, and then use omega = v / r to find the answer? The reason I'm confused is because at the note at the bottom of the question, it says treat the door as a rod rotating about its end, which is a hint to use Inertia = (1/3)ML^2. Conservation of energy, not momentum, has inertia in its equation.
 
shaqtus said:
Conservation of energy, not momentum, has inertia in its equation.
Conservation of angular momentum will involve the moment of inertia.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top