MHB Did my book do this wrong? (Vector Cross Product)

Pindrought
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Reading a book about 3d math, and I am confused as to what happened on this Vector Cross Product problem. I'm thinking there was just an error that wasn't caught.

i92Cuh.png
For the first row, instead of (3)(8)-(-4)(-5) shouldn't it have been (3)(8)-(4)(-5) and had the same displayed result of 44?
And for the second row, instead of (-4)(2)-(1)(8) shouldn't it have been (4)(2)-(1)(8) and had the result of 0?
For the last row, shouldn't the final result be -11?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The book is indeed wrong:

$(1,3,4) \times (2,-5,8) = ((3)(8) - (4)(-5), (4)(2) - (1)(8), (1)(-5) - (3)(2))$

$= (44,0,-11)$ which speaks somewhat ill of the original author and proof-reader of your text.
 
Pindrought said:
Reading a book about 3d math, and I am confused as to what happened on this Vector Cross Product problem. I'm thinking there was just an error that wasn't caught.

For the first row, instead of (3)(8)-(-4)(-5) shouldn't it have been (3)(8)-(4)(-5) and had the same displayed result of 4?
And for the second row, instead of (-4)(2)-(1)(8) shouldn't it have been (4)(2)-(1)(8) and had the result of 0?
For the last row, shouldn't the final result be -11?

Thanks!
There are at least two misprints/errors in the example. It looks as though the author intended to write $$\begin{bmatrix}1\\3\\ {\color{red}-}4 \end{bmatrix} \times \begin{bmatrix}2\\-5\\ 8 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}(3)(8) - (-4)(-5)\\(-4)(2) - (1)(8)\\ (1)(-5) - (3)(2) \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}4\\-16\\ {\color{red}-11} \end{bmatrix}.$$
 
Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K