Difference between an ideal gas and a real gas

AI Thread Summary
An ideal gas is characterized by the absence of intermolecular forces, behaving like a collection of elastic, non-interacting particles. In contrast, real gases experience electromagnetic interactions, leading to attractive and repulsive forces that affect their behavior and density. Real gases are more compact due to these forces, and under strong attraction, they can condense into liquids. Additionally, ideal gas particles are considered infinitesimally small, while real gas particles have finite sizes. The distinction between ideal and real gases is crucial for understanding gas behavior in various conditions.
pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey
Could somebody please explain what the difference between an ideal gas and a real gas are? Or post a suitable link from which I can understand the concept surrounding this issue.
Thanks
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An ideal gas is a picture of a gas where there are no forces in between molecules except when they are in contact. You can think of an ideal gas as a collection of billiard balls bouncing around in 3 dimensions. To the billiard balls there is no difference in being a 1 meter away from the next closest ball, or being 1 mm away. Because there are no forces between the different balls. When they hit they bounce off each other instantly with no loss of energy and go in new directions.

In a real gas, there are additional forces in play due to electromagnetic interactions betweeen the molecules. Usually attractive forces are stronger at longer distances and repulsive forces are stronger at very short distances. So real gasses usually will be a little more compact (but not always) because they molecules are pulling each other together. If a gas has strong enough attractive forces, it turns into a liquid, where all the particles will condence so much that they are not allowed to go free of each other anymore.

The only difference between an ideal gas and a real gas is the types of forces we are allowed to use. There is no such thing as an ideal gas in real life, but it is a very good approximation for many gasses like N2, O2, and Nobel gases. It makes the math a lot easier to work with.

~Lyuokdea
 
Lyuokdea is almost right - but there is one more important difference. Particles of ideal gas are infinitesimally small, while these of real gases have finite sizes.
 
I would just like to add that in an ideal gas, any collisions between the molecules or the container is assumed to be elastic. Also, the collision time is infintesimal when compared with the time between collisions.

~H
 
Last edited:
Thanks you so much for everyone that took the time to kindly reply, especially ~Lyuokdea for the in depth explanation.
Pavadrin
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top