Difference Between Energy, Power & Work: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter imortaltoad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Power Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between energy, power, and work using examples of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy on a slide. It explains that while potential energy remains constant when height is the same, the work required to move objects can differ due to friction. Specifically, as the angle of inclination decreases, the normal force increases, leading to greater friction and more work needed to move the object. The kinetic energy at the bottom of the slide is consistent for the same mass, regardless of the slide's steepness. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the relationship between energy, work, and the forces acting on objects in motion.
imortaltoad
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
okay, so what is the difference between these two situations. I don't really seem to get it

http://img190.yfrog.com/img190/8400/2sit.jpg

For the slide, shouldn't the distance be shorter since the slide gets steeper meaning the speed increases !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the person is at the top of the slide they have lots of gravitational potential energy, but no kinetic energy (they aren't moving). As they begin to slide down, that gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Remember that K=1/2mv^2. Since the height of the slide does not change, our potential energy is the same in both cases, which means that our kinetic energy must also be the same. Assuming it is the same person sliding down the slide, and that they didn't just go pig out at the buffet, their mass is also the same. According to our equation, if the kinetic energy is the same, the mass is the same, then the speed at which the slider leaves the slide must be the same.
 
okay I understand that, but what confuses me is that the situation on the top, with box A and B.

I mean here the height is identical so it means Potential energy should be the same at the top. so shouldn't it require equal amount of work to gain the same amount of potential energy?
 
In 9.), there is friction between the block and the ramp, so in addition to doing work on the box to increase its potential energy, work has to be done to move the box against the force of friction. The work done to move the box vertically to increase its potential energy is the same for both cases: they are both lifted h distance. However, the friction force acts against moving the block across the ramps surface, and is equal to the coefficient of friction times the normal force (Ffric = mu*N). When the angle of inclination decreases, the normal force N on the block by the ramp increases (N=mgcos(theta)), and therefore the friction force increases. The work done on the block by the friction force is Work = mu*N*X, where X is the distance moved across the ramp. Since the second ramp has a longer distance for the block to move across to reach the same height, the friction force acts for a longer distance, and more work has to be done on the block to reach the top.
 
Ooohhhhh alright! Thanks alot=) both posts helped
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

Theoretical velocities at different heights sliding down an inclined plane
Replies
4
Views
838
Work done by power supply to maintain a constant current
Replies
0
Views
557
A block dropping onto a spring system
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
Applying the Work-Energy theorem to a system
Replies
9
Views
1K
Is the Photoelectric Effect Proof That Light Is a Particle?
Replies
35
Views
3K
Thermodynamics: Internal Energy, Heat and Work Problem
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Work energy principle and power
Replies
1
Views
1K
Find net external work of a system w/ 2 objects w/ opposite forces
Replies
8
Views
1K
Understanding work in translation and rotation of a magnetic dipole
Replies
1
Views
2K
Conservation of energy in x vs y direction
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top