Difference Between Energy, Power & Work: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter imortaltoad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Power Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences between energy, power, and work using examples of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy on a slide. It explains that while potential energy remains constant when height is the same, the work required to move objects can differ due to friction. Specifically, as the angle of inclination decreases, the normal force increases, leading to greater friction and more work needed to move the object. The kinetic energy at the bottom of the slide is consistent for the same mass, regardless of the slide's steepness. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the relationship between energy, work, and the forces acting on objects in motion.
imortaltoad
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
okay, so what is the difference between these two situations. I don't really seem to get it

http://img190.yfrog.com/img190/8400/2sit.jpg

For the slide, shouldn't the distance be shorter since the slide gets steeper meaning the speed increases !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the person is at the top of the slide they have lots of gravitational potential energy, but no kinetic energy (they aren't moving). As they begin to slide down, that gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Remember that K=1/2mv^2. Since the height of the slide does not change, our potential energy is the same in both cases, which means that our kinetic energy must also be the same. Assuming it is the same person sliding down the slide, and that they didn't just go pig out at the buffet, their mass is also the same. According to our equation, if the kinetic energy is the same, the mass is the same, then the speed at which the slider leaves the slide must be the same.
 
okay I understand that, but what confuses me is that the situation on the top, with box A and B.

I mean here the height is identical so it means Potential energy should be the same at the top. so shouldn't it require equal amount of work to gain the same amount of potential energy?
 
In 9.), there is friction between the block and the ramp, so in addition to doing work on the box to increase its potential energy, work has to be done to move the box against the force of friction. The work done to move the box vertically to increase its potential energy is the same for both cases: they are both lifted h distance. However, the friction force acts against moving the block across the ramps surface, and is equal to the coefficient of friction times the normal force (Ffric = mu*N). When the angle of inclination decreases, the normal force N on the block by the ramp increases (N=mgcos(theta)), and therefore the friction force increases. The work done on the block by the friction force is Work = mu*N*X, where X is the distance moved across the ramp. Since the second ramp has a longer distance for the block to move across to reach the same height, the friction force acts for a longer distance, and more work has to be done on the block to reach the top.
 
Ooohhhhh alright! Thanks alot=) both posts helped
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top