- #1

- 450

- 244

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0133214311/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Other
- Thread starter smodak
- Start date

- #1

- 450

- 244

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0133214311/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20

- #2

Ssnow

Gold Member

- 532

- 156

- #3

- 450

- 244

So, are you saying that the nature of problems and exercises are different between mathematical methods for science and and engineering mathematics book and and the theory is the same?

- #4

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,796

- 1,669

Advanced engineering math texts are generally used for advanced calculus courses in engineering programs to teach multivariable and vector calculus and complex analysis. Other topics may include an introduction to PDEs and harmonic functions. A lot of the topics taught in these texts are useful for physics students.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0133214311/?tag=pfamazon01-20&tag=pfamazon01-20

Math methods, on the other hand, will tend to focus on using and applying numerical techniques to solve various physics problems.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #5

- 450

- 244

Advanced engineering math texts are generally used for advanced calculus courses in engineering programs to teach multivariable and vector calculus and complex analysis. Other topics may include an introduction to PDEs and harmonic functions. A lot of the topics taught in these texts are useful for physics students.

Math methods, on the other hand, will tend to focus on using and applying numerical techniques to solve various physics problems.Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciencesby Mary Boas is one of the better known titles for this type of text. Its primary focus is on problem solving techniques, rather than advancing your knowledge of higher math.

- #6

- 328

- 126

- #7

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,796

- 1,669

No, you were asking about textbooks.Thanks. So, physics is more application (problem solving) based and engineering is more theory? I would have thought just the opposite.

If you want to discuss that topic, start a different thread.

The way undergraduate math is taught in the engineering schools is you start out with single variable calculus and then move on to more advanced math topics, usually in the second year. These advanced topics would include a course in ODEs followed by multivariable calculus, the latter topic being taught as "Advanced Engineering Math" or some such description.

Physics majors and engineering majors are both going to take similar math sequences as undergrads. Some of the math texts in the two undergrad programs may even overlap.

- #8

- 450

- 244

No, you were asking about textbooks.

The comments I provided about textbooks are not intended to distinguish the study of physics from the study of engineering.

If you want to discuss that topic, start a different thread.

The way undergraduate math is taught in the engineering schools is you start out with single variable calculus and then move on to more advanced math topics, usually in the second year. These advanced topics would include a course in ODEs followed by multivariable calculus, the latter topic being taught as "Advanced Engineering Math" or some such description.

Physics majors and engineering majors are both going to take similar math sequences as undergrads. Some of the math texts in the two undergrad programs may even overlap.

- #9

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,796

- 1,669

No I was talking about Textbooks only. But Textbooks are modeled after courses and vice - versa. It just seems strange that math methods books may be more application based than engineering math textbooks. But your explanation below makes sense. Thanks.

You seem to labor under the impression that there is one thing called "engineering" math and something else called "physics" math.

It's all the same math. Engineering students learn complex analysis just like the physics students do. Which group will wind up using complex analysis more after graduation? Probably the newly minted physicists, unless the engineering students decide on post graduate work.

In the engineering courses, which are taught separately from the math courses, there will be some focus on the application of math to solving particular problems in a given field of engineering. Each brand of engineering has some core calculations which must be understood by the student and applied in his work after he graduates and starts practicing as an engineer. There will also be some overlap, but usually not too much, which is why civil engineers are different from mechanical engineers are different from electrical engineers, etc.

- #10

- 450

- 244

You seem to labor under the impression that there is one thing called "engineering" math and something else called "physics" math.

It's all the same math. Engineering students learn complex analysis just like the physics students do. Which group will wind up using complex analysis more after graduation? Probably the newly minted physicists, unless the engineering students decide on post graduate work.

In the engineering courses, which are taught separately from the math courses, there will be some focus on the application of math to solving particular problems in a given field of engineering. Each brand of engineering has some core calculations which must be understood by the student and applied in his work after he graduates and starts practicing as an engineer. There will also be some overlap, but usually not too much, which is why civil engineers are different from mechanical engineers are different from electrical engineers, etc.

- #11

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,796

- 1,669

The textbook market is a very lucrative one for the big publishing houses. They can take the same basic material and repackage it for use in different courses by making a few cosmetic changes, slapping on a different title, whatever. It's 90% perception, 10% reality.Precisely my point. If you read my OP, you will see that that is exactly what I observed. There is virtually no difference between 'engineering' and 'science' math books in general, so, why stereotype them as such?

- #12

- 450

- 244

I hear you.The textbook market is a very lucrative one for the big publishing houses. They can take the same basic material and repackage it for use in different courses by making a few cosmetic changes, slapping on a different title, whatever. It's 90% perception, 10% reality.

- #13

- 35

- 3

There is a reason why engineering is called applied physics, and in engineering, besides other techniques, a hell lot of numerical analysis is also used.........back to the original question, I have read both engineering math and math methods for physics and I have found them quite similar, in fact, math methods books often put exercises from engineering background.Thanks. So, physics is more application (problem solving) based and engineering is more theory? I would have thought just the opposite.

- #14

Ssnow

Gold Member

- 532

- 156

So, are you saying that the nature of problems and exercises are different between mathematical methods for science and and engineering mathematics book and and the theory is the same?

mathematical methods for science and engineering mathematics book sometimes can have similar topics in common (not exactly the same ... )

Share: