Difference between neutral and ground

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the fundamental differences between neutral and ground in electrical systems. Neutral is an active part of the circuit that can carry current, while ground serves as a safety mechanism, providing a path for fault currents to prevent electric shock. In typical American wiring, the neutral wire is connected to the ground at the breaker panel, but under fault conditions, the neutral can become energized. Additionally, the concept of current sources is debated, with participants asserting that current sources are not standalone entities but rather derived from voltage sources and loads.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical circuits and wiring, particularly in AC systems.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of voltage sources and current sources.
  • Knowledge of safety protocols when working with electrical systems.
  • Basic principles of electrical grounding and bonding.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of grounding in electrical safety standards, such as NEC (National Electrical Code).
  • Study the differences between Thevenin and Norton equivalences in circuit analysis.
  • Learn about the operation and applications of ion chambers as current sources.
  • Explore practical wiring examples and safety measures for residential electrical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Electricians, electrical engineers, safety inspectors, and anyone involved in residential or commercial electrical installations will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
cmb said:
Sounds like you are describing a 2 phase system. Does USA really have 2 phase domestic supply at the distribution panel? How/where does it convert from 3 phase?

No it is definitely single phase. To call it two phase you would be alleging that a multi phase system can be created just by tapping a single transformer secondary winding that is magnetically coupled to a single phase primary winding. If that were in fact true than you could create any number of phases you desired by multi tapping a single transformer winding.

--
Tom
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
HORNETD said:
No it is definitely single phase. To call it two phase you would be alleging that a multi phase system can be created just by tapping a single transformer secondary winding that is magnetically coupled to a single phase primary winding. If that were in fact true than you could create any number of phases you desired by multi tapping a single transformer winding.

--
Tom

I don't see what you are saying.

A 'neutral' is a line with [nominally] constant charge on it (hopefully 'net neutral charge', if earthed).

A 'hot' AC line is one with periodic time-varying charge on it.

Two phases are two lines with periodic time-varying charge on them, but of different phase angles.

A two phase system is one with two lines with periodic time-varying charge on them at 180 degree apart. You get this from one phase feeding into a transformer with a grounded centre-tap secondary. The two outputs will be at 180 deg out of phase = two phase.

No, you cannot tap any old number of phases off a simple transformer. If you feed one phase in, you get one phase out of one winding, or two phases out of two windings which might be 180 translated.
 
  • #33
From a very practical point of view it should be remembered that Earth (or ground) varies a little from place to place. Electronic circutry can be badly affected by this. In any large electronic instalation (e.g. a building-wide audio or CCTV system, or even an audio mixing panel) every unit must be run back, usually by the coaxial cable shielding, to a common 'earth point' to avoid noise.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
cmb said:
I don't see what you are saying.

A 'neutral' is a line with [nominally] constant charge on it (hopefully 'net neutral charge', if earthed).

A 'hot' AC line is one with periodic time-varying charge on it.

Two phases are two lines with periodic time-varying charge on them, but of different phase angles.

A two phase system is one with two lines with periodic time-varying charge on them at 180 degree apart. You get this from one phase feeding into a transformer with a grounded centre-tap secondary. The two outputs will be at 180 deg out of phase = two phase.

No, you cannot tap any old number of phases off a simple transformer. If you feed one phase in, you get one phase out of one winding, or two phases out of two windings which might be 180 translated.

It's really an age old argument. You are certainly not wrong in what you are saying.

But you would agree that when you put a line to neutral across a load...you do get one single phase Sin wave...and one Single phase current wave?

As long as you agree with that...you can say whatever you want in my mind.
 
  • #35
It is SINGLE PHASE! I emphasize this so much since there is actually a system that is two phase. The phases are 90 degrees apart. There needs to be a differentiation between the two, so I will rant and rave until it is realized.
 
  • #36
Averagesupernova said:
It is SINGLE PHASE! I emphasize this so much since there is actually a system that is two phase. The phases are 90 degrees apart. There needs to be a differentiation between the two, so I will rant and rave until it is realized.

I agree with you...but CMB is a pretty smart guy...so I don't want to discount his opinion.

Tell me about this two phase system. Two vectors 90 degrees apart. When line to line or line to neutral...don't they still just make single phase?
 
  • #37
A single pair of conductors is always just a single phase. It takes at least three conductors to get more than one phase. So I guess I don't understand your question.
 
  • #38
Averagesupernova said:
It is SINGLE PHASE! I emphasize this so much since there is actually a system that is two phase. The phases are 90 degrees apart. There needs to be a differentiation between the two, so I will rant and rave until it is realized.
You can call that a 2-phase system if you like, but please let me know; what is the phase angle between the four phases in a 4-phase system?
 
  • #39
psparky said:
It's really an age old argument. You are certainly not wrong in what you are saying.

But you would agree that when you put a line to neutral across a load...you do get one single phase Sin wave...and one Single phase current wave?

As long as you agree with that...you can say whatever you want in my mind.

Absolutely - the two hot lines of a 2 phase system together = 1 phase. However, the point to note is that the average absolute voltage at any moment in time of the two lines should be zero (wrt the neutral/earth). This is essentially the defining point of a poly-phase system - the potentials of all the lines will sum to zero at any given moment of time. As a result, the 'earth' can be used as a 'virtual' return line for all the phases together.

This is quite different to a single line (single, or out of any number of phases) in which the average voltage between the two lines varies wrt neutral/ground.
 
Last edited:
  • #40
cmb said:
You can call that a 2-phase system if you like, but please let me know; what is the phase angle between the four phases in a 4-phase system?

That's what I'm trying to say...you're "2 phase" system at 90 degrees is no different than the "2 phase" system at 180 degrees.

They both produce a single phase sinusoid across a load.

I would agree that a 4 phase system is a 4 phase. 4 different sinusoids.
 
  • #41
As far as I know there is no such thing as a 4-phase system. If you want to call 2-phase 90 degree system 4-phase because you can center tap the transformers then I guess, but you know my feelings on this. You could call our 3-phase system 6-phase by doing the same thing but again I call B.S.
 
  • #42
cmb said:
Absolutely - the two hot lines of a 2 phase system together = 1 phase. However, the point to note is that the average absolute voltage of the two lines would be zero (wrt the neutral/earth).

Yes, the DC is zero. Agreed.

However, the RMS is what counts.
 
  • #43
Averagesupernova said:
As far as I know there is no such thing as a 4-phase system. If you want to call 2-phase 4-phase because you can center tap the transformers then I guess, but you know my feelings on this. You could call our 3-phase system 6-phase by doing the same thing but again I call B.S.

Things don't have to be three phase. They could have made the generators 9 phase if they wanted to. With 9 phase motors as loads...etc.

They just figured that 3 phase would do the best for the money involved.

But certainly...a bigger than 3 phase system can exist. Does it typically exist? No.
 
  • #44
This is nuts. There is a good reason it is called what it is to avoid confusion between one system and the other. The basis is this: If you can take any pair of wires in a system and compare the phase of another pair (one wire being common between pairs is permitted) and come up with something other than 180 degrees out of 0 degrees out then it is more than single phase. Until then, SINGLE PHASE!
 
  • #45
Averagesupernova said:
This is nuts. There is a good reason it is called what it is to avoid confusion between one system and the other. The basis is this: If you can take any pair of wires in a system and compare the phase of another pair (one wire being common between pairs is permitted) and come up with something other than 180 degrees out of 0 degrees out then it is more than single phase. Until then, SINGLE PHASE!

Again. I agree.

3 phase (line to line to line) or higher is multiphase.

Line to line to neutral is not three phase. It's two different voltages being delivered to two different loads. An electric oven is a good example. Line to line for heat...line to neutral for control. Two single phase systems.
 
  • #46
Averagesupernova said:
This is nuts. There is a good reason it is called what it is to avoid confusion between one system and the other. The basis is this: If you can take any pair of wires in a system and compare the phase of another pair (one wire being common between pairs is permitted) and come up with something other than 180 degrees out of 0 degrees out then it is more than single phase. Until then, SINGLE PHASE!

If you are saying that convention has called two lines out of phase by 180 'single phase', three lines out of phase by 120 '3-phase' and 4 lines 90 out of phase '2-phase' then there's nothing much I can say logically about that! I'm not saying you are wrong, it just doesn't make much sense.

360°/1 = 1 phase
360°/2 = 1 phase
360°/3 = 3 phase
360°/4 = 2 phase
?

Well... so much for conventions...
 
  • #47
cmb said:
If you are saying that convention has called two lines out of phase by 180 'single phase', three lines out of phase by 120 '3-phase' and 4 lines 90 out of phase '2-phase' then there's nothing much I can say logically about that! I'm not saying you are wrong, it just doesn't make much sense.

360°/1 = 1 phase
360°/2 = 1 phase
360°/3 = 3 phase
360°/4 = 2 phase
?

Well... so much for conventions...

First of all, you cannot have 2 lines 180 degrees out of phase. Phase is relative. You don't have enough conductors to make that claim. So I think what I have quoted in this post is out the window. You can try again though with different wording so we can work towards a resolution. :)
 
  • #48
cmb said:
If you are saying that convention has called two lines out of phase by 180 'single phase', three lines out of phase by 120 '3-phase' and 4 lines 90 out of phase '2-phase' then there's nothing much I can say logically about that! I'm not saying you are wrong, it just doesn't make much sense.

360°/1 = 1 phase
360°/2 = 1 phase
360°/3 = 3 phase
360°/4 = 2 phase
?

Well... so much for conventions...

360/4=4 phase
360/5=5 phase
360/6=6 phase...etc.

If a electric motor builder gets bored and decides to build a 9 phase generator...he can do that. He can also build a 9 phase motor for it to run off of. The 9 phase generator will have 9 line to line conductors and one ground. If he wants to have a neutral he can. But he doesn't have to.

This is 360/9...aka 9 phase! 9 vectors 40 degrees apart. Single phase will never exist in this system unless you only utilitize two conductors.
 
  • #49
Averagesupernova said:
First of all, you cannot have 2 lines 180 degrees out of phase. Phase is relative. You don't have enough conductors to make that claim. So I think what I have quoted in this post is out the window. You can try again though with different wording so we can work towards a resolution. :)

The origin of this came from post #25. I asked whether the system described was a '2-phase' system - consisting of two lines, one at -120V while the other was at +120V with respect to a third line, the neutral return. If I had one neutral and one sinusoid, I'd definitely call that 1 phase. But it seems to me that if you stick that into a transformer and centre tap the secondary, you then end up with the scenario described in #25. Three lines total, a neutral and two phase lines 180 opposed.

I have just taken a look at my site transformer, which are set up in exactly this way. It has a 'single phase' transformer in it where the secondary is centre tapped to ground (it means you only get ~75V away from ground at anyone time on either of the two lines, but you get the 110V RMS voltage enough to run your kit (this reduces risk of shock on work site because your kit never gets more than that 75V from ground)). It even says on it "2P + E"! What is "2P"?

2pP2140955s.gif
 
  • #50
cmb said:
The origin of this came from post #25. I asked whether the system described was a '2-phase' system - consisting of two lines, one at -120V while the other was at +120V with respect to a third line, the neutral return. If I had one neutral and one sinusoid, I'd definitely call that 1 phase. But it seems to me that if you stick that into a transformer and centre tap the secondary, you then end up with the scenario described in #25. Three lines total, a neutral and two phase lines 180 opposed.

I have just taken a look at my site transformer, which are set up in exactly this way. It has a 'single phase' transformer in it where the secondary is centre tapped to ground (it means you only get ~75V away from ground at anyone time on either of the two lines, but you get the 110V RMS voltage enough to run your kit (this reduces risk of shock on work site because your kit never gets more than that 75V from ground)). It even says on it "2P + E"! What is "2P"?

2pP2140955s.gif

2P = 2 pole...aka...single phase...lol
 
  • #51
psparky said:
2P = 2 pole...aka...single phase...lol

Well, if it is convention to call that 'one phase' then that's the convention! Still makes no sense to me to call anything other than 180 deg phasing 'two phase', but if that's what folks do, then that's what folks do!
 
  • #52
cmb said:
Well, if it is convention to call that 'one phase' then that's the convention! Still makes no sense to me to call anything other than 180 deg phasing 'two phase', but if that's what folks do, then that's what folks do!

Again I hear ya.

Here's possibly the source of all this confusion.

Before there is a load connected...there is absolutely two phases.

In a usa panel...two phases 180 degrees out of phase.

Here's the difference...when you are talking about "across the load"...then you have single phase. The two phases add (actually subtract) to be one single phase.

The defense rests.
 
  • #53
Current and Voltage Sources
Theory:
Voltage Source and Current Source are both descriptions of theoretical components. A 1V voltage source could supply 10000000000A through a thick copper bar to maintain 1V across it. A 1A current source could produce 1000000000V so as to ensure you still got 1A into a really good 'insulator'.

In Practice:
A power source which can supply enough current (over its specified current range) to maintain that voltage independent of the load) is what we would call a voltage source. It will have (or be measured to have), zero internal series resistance. Car Batteries do quite a good job as a voltage source for many applications. The Mains is fairly good but you put fuses in the way to limit the current, rather than calling its bluff about being 230V when it's fed into a 100kW load.

A power source that can supply enough Volts to maintain a specified current,independent of the load (again, over a specified Voltage range) is what we would call a Current Source and will behave as if it had a very high series resistance. These aren't so common in every day life but a high energy beam of electrons in a vacuum (say a CRT beam from the electron gun) is a pretty good current source because you have 'that many electrons' arriving at the screen over a vast range of screen voltages. Many CD Power supplies can be set to go into 'constant current mode' and will reduce their output voltage appropriately to maintain a set current limit into a misbehaving piece of equipment.
 
  • #54
For the record I have not said anything about convention concerning the number of wires dictating what we call it. If you are reading this from my posts you are incorrect.
 
  • #55
cmb said:
I don't see what you are saying.

A 'neutral' is a line with [nominally] constant charge on it (hopefully 'net neutral charge', if earthed).

A 'hot' AC line is one with periodic time-varying charge on it.

Two phases are two lines with periodic time-varying charge on them, but of different phase angles.

A two phase system is one with two lines with periodic time-varying charge on them at 180 degree apart. You get this from one phase feeding into a transformer with a grounded center-tap secondary. The two outputs will be at 180 deg out of phase = two phase.

No, you cannot tap any old number of phases off a simple transformer. If you feed one phase in, you get one phase out of one winding, or two phases out of two windings which might be 180 translated.

So what do I have if I connect the three secondary windings of a three phase transformer or transformer array in a delta configuration so as to deliver three phase two hundred forty volt power? That is three phase is it not?

I am allowed to ground one of the phase conductors but I am not required to do so. Ungrounded Delta secondary three phase transformers are used to supply loads were the failure of the power to the load may introduce a greater hazard than the electric fault would. Some of the loads that are supplied from such systems are: certain types of cranes; dust collectors in cotton mills, graineries, and explosive manufacturing plants; ventilation systems in flammable liquid handling facilities, refrigeration in pharmaceutical manufacturing, fire pumps in buildings that present a high hazard fire risk, and the list goes on. What may be installed on such systems but is again not required is a fault detection system the function of which is to alert facility personnel of the fault so it can be cleared before a second fault can occur on another phase of the supply that would cause the conductor over current protection to open.

Now I will center tap the A - C phase in order to obtain one hundred twenty volt power for receptacle outlets. Do I still have three phase or is it something else? The National Electric Code in the United States requires that I ground the center tap connection when I use it as part of a premise wiring system but I digress. This arrangement of a secondary with three windings with one of those windings center tapped to provide one hundred twenty volts for receptacle outlets is very common were the utilities transformer array will be used to supply such premises as a small manufacturing plant, a large farm, or a multi tenant building were only some of the tenants need three phase power. In that application each of the windings is often contained in a separate enclosure with the external winding terminals connected to form the Delta secondary with the primary often connected in a wye configuration. What the utilities install is three ordinary pole mounted transformers that could be used to provide 240 / 120 volt service if used as stand alone units. Often the transformer that is to supply the 120 volt loads is larger than the two that will only supply the other two phases of the thee phase premises supply. That larger transformer may also be used to supply 120 / 240 volt services to other premisses located in the same area. The transformer bushings that are at the end of each winding are connected to the next transformers winding at each end of the secondary winding. The center taps of the two smaller transformers are not connected to anything. The primary windings are connected together at one end of each winding to form a wye connected primary. The other end of the primary windings are connected to one of each of the three phases in the utility distribution network.

So without the center tap on one of the secondary windings such as in ungrounded three phase delta it is three phase. Again I ask what does it become when I use the center tap of one of the secondary windings to supply 120 volt loads?

By the way this system of three secondary windings with one secondary winding center tapped is called high leg delta by utility linemen and electricians. The phase conductor with the higher voltage to ground is customarily called the wild or stinger leg to remind everyone that it will have a higher voltage to ground than the other two phase conductors so it cannot be used to supply single phase loads against ground. In actual practice the three phase loads are supplied from power panels that have three buss bars but no neutral buss. The buss bar that is supplied from the phase conductor with the higher voltage to ground will be configured physically so that a single phase breaker will not connect to it. That phase conductor that has the higher voltage to ground is required to be coded orange at every place that it is accessible in order to warn of its higher voltage.

The one hundred twenty volt and single phase two forty volt loads will be supplied from lighting panels that only have the two phase conductors that are connected to the ends of the center tapped winding. These panels will also have three buss bars but one of them will be for connections to the grounded current carrying conductor and will not be configured physically to have breakers of any description mounted to it. The phase conductor with the higher voltage to ground is not brought to the lighting panels.

Obviously I think that this arrangement is still three phase. Additionally I cannot see how the tenants or adjacent premises that are supplied from that same array off of the larger of the three transformer windings without the third phase even being brought to those premises are two phase when they are connected to a single phase of a three phase secondary which is delta connected.

I have been wrong before and I will be wrong again but I just cannot buy a split phase being two phases.

--
Tom
 
  • #56
HORNETD said:
ted.

I have been wrong before and I will be wrong again but I just cannot buy a split phase being two phases.

--
Tom

I feel the same too. Using the same term for what you call "Split Phase" and a Three (or any multi-) Phase system is not helpful. Whilst it is possible to represent two anti-phase signals on an Argand Diagram, just as you can represent a multi-phase set, is there any point? The situation is one-dimensional and does not call for a 2D representation. It's such a special case that it should be treated and discussed differently.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
10K