Difference Between Plasma and Radiation

AI Thread Summary
Plasma consists of electrically charged particles, while radiation refers to electromagnetic photons. Plasmas are generally more destructive and can generate radiation effects, particularly in the context of satellites. The Van Allen radiation belts, named for their radiation characteristics, are primarily composed of plasma originating from solar wind and cosmic radiation, mainly consisting of protons and electrons. Plasma exhibits collective behavior, allowing it to shield electrical fields, whereas radiation does not display such behavior and can include both charged particles and photons. Understanding these differences is crucial for assessing their impacts on spacecraft and satellite technology.
hamzaaaa
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi all

In general sometimes we talk about plasma effects on satellites and radiation effects on satellites. Can someone tell the difference between the two?

Thanks and Best Regards
Hamza
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Plasma consists of electrically charged particles, whereas radiation is EM photons. Plasmas are more destructive. Energetic EM radiation can, however, generate plasmas in Earth's atmosphere.
 
I'm assuming that the term radiation is used in this way only for talking about the two effects on satellites? As radiation can also be charged particles.
 
Yes normally when we look at the two effects we talk about plasma and radiation.
But another thing I don't understand is Van Allan Radiation Belt. The name says its a radiation belt but it is a constituent of plasma. And then there is another plasma sheet which trails at the dark side of the Earth in outerspace.
 
A plasma is simply an ionized gas in which electrons are separated from nuclei or ions. The energies required to ionize atoms is on the order of eV. Some plasmas, particularly fusion plasmas would have temperatures in the keV range, which is low energy for radiation. Radiation would encompass ions, electrons and photons, over a broad range of energies.

High energy radiation has energy in the high keV to MeV range.

The Van Allen radiation belts are a collection of plasma or radiation that are thought to originate from the solar wind and cosmic radaition. It appears they are mostly protons and electrons, which are somewhat confined by the Earth's magnetic field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

http://rbsp.jhuapl.edu/science/overview.php
 
Hi good question. A plasma is a collective group of charged particles. It consists of both positive and negative particles and there has to be enough particles present in a volume so that they interact in a collective way.

So if a spaceship meets a plasma the plasma particles will move to shield the electrical field from the spaceship so that the field is zero inside the plasma. This is called Debye shielding.

Radiation can be single particles of either positive or negative charge and of course photons. There is no collective behaviour. You can get radiation from a plasma. In fact a little plasma radiation brightens up everybody on the beach.

Plasmas can cause damage by their collective behaviour. By trying to shield an electrical field they can charge up a spacecraft and cause particles from the plasma to strike the spacecraft at high speeds and damage the space craft.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top