How can different distances and speeds result in the same velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BUTTER-BENZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
Different distances and times can yield the same velocity because velocity is defined as the ratio of distance to time. In the examples given, both 10m in 13s and 25m in 32s approximate to a velocity of 8 m/s when rounded. The confusion arises from the varying distances and times, but the underlying principle is that different combinations can produce the same ratio. The discussion emphasizes that while the exact values differ, the calculated velocities can be equivalent. Understanding this concept clarifies how different scenarios can lead to the same velocity outcome.
BUTTER-BENZ
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
10m/13s = .769 m/s (made into 8m/s)

but 25m/32s = .78125 m/s (also made into 8 m/s)

how can they both be 8 m/s? when they have a different distance and speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


BUTTER-BENZ said:
10m/13s = .769 m/s (made into 8m/s)

but 25m/32s = .78125 m/s (also made into 8 m/s)

how can they both be 8 m/s? when they have a different distance and speed?

made into 8 m/s ? It should be .8 m/s, they just approximated the number


marlon
 


and they don't have different distance and SPEED !marlon
 


so .8 is a correct answer for BOTH :S
 


so confusing..
 


BUTTER-BENZ said:
so confusing..

why is this confusing ?

it's easy as hell...

velocity is the ratio of distance and time, so even if distance and time differ the ratio can be the same...
this is just like saying 2 = 10/5 or 2 = 6/3

marlon
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Help with question on motion: Avoiding a rear-end collision
Replies
6
Views
3K
Velocity required to escape the solar system
Replies
15
Views
1K
Relating acceleration to distance and time
Replies
5
Views
3K
Why do I keep getting friction coefficient as a negative?
Replies
17
Views
3K
How Long for a Beam of Light to Reach Earth?
Replies
21
Views
1K
Question about differences in speeds vs velocities.
Replies
2
Views
1K
Is this projectile motion situation possible?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Velocity of image in plane mirror
Replies
5
Views
2K
I need opinions on a Projectile Motion problem that I made up
Replies
11
Views
2K
Shortest distance along the shore and into the lake
Replies
6
Views
941

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top