Differential Amplifier Common Mode Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the common mode problem in differential amplifiers, particularly the relationship between AC and DC currents in determining the emitter resistance (Re). It highlights that while the DC values of currents are used to set the operating point, the AC analysis employs small-signal values, leading to potential confusion. The value of Re is derived from the DC emitter current (Ie) and varies with it, as it represents a tangent slope on the non-linear I-V curve of the base-emitter junction. The AC current (ib) is treated as a small signal, which has minimal impact on Re, provided the AC deviation remains small. However, larger AC signals can cause significant changes in Re, leading to nonlinear gain and distortion in the amplifier's output.
chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
3
There are a couple of things I don't understand about the DA in general and when we use it in the common mode in particular (same input ac voltage to both input terminals). I am using Electronic Circuit and Theory by Louis Nashelsky and Robert Boylstad (p.591 for DA).

When we set the operating point, we do it using DC voltages which sets the values Ic, Ib and Ie.

In the ac analysis, however, we use the values of AC voltages to calculate the voltage across the output resistor. For the re model of the transistor, the value of re in the ac domain is calculated by r_i=\frac{26mv}{I_b} where Ib is the ac current.

However, r_e=\frac{26mv}{I_e}=\frac{26mv}{\beta I_b}=\frac{r_i}{\beta} is calculated using the DC value of Ie.

How is that possible? The DC and AC values of currents are bound to be different, but they are used interchangeably!

I thought that the net current would be the ac+dc values of the current (eg. Ie net=Ie ac + Ie dc).

Sorry for the long post, I couldn't help it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone? Please?
 
The Re value is dependent upon the dc value of current. The base-emitter junction, herein b-e jcn, has an logarithmic/exponential V vs. I (I vs. V) characteristic. Modeling the b-e jcn as a resistor is not valid under general large signal conditions. Re is a small signal value taken as a tangent to the I-V curve at a specific value of Ie. Ie, Vbe, & Ib denote dc values, & ie, vbe, & ib denote small signal ac values.

Since the curve is non-linear, the tangent slope changes depending on where you are on the I-V curve. Hence Re, which is the slope of V vs. I, or the inverse slope of I vs. V, varies with the dc value Ie. At larger values of Ie, the slope increases, and Re decreases.

Hence a larger Ie, emitter dc value or bias, results in a smaller Re which is an ac value. Have I explained it well? I used to be an adjunct professor of electronics, and I used Boylstad's texts.

Claude
 
So we basically ignore the ac signal while setting the Re value, and this value depends on the dc bias.

Then the current we measure using the ac analysis is not Ib but ib (the ac current), and for this current Re is just a simple resistor. Also this current does not have any effect on Re whatsoever... is that right?
 
Only a slight effect, too small to worry about as long as the ac deviation is small. When the b-e jcn deviates from its steady state operating point, the slope of the I-V curve changes, hence Re changes. If the ac signal is not small, but large, then Re changes with the signal, and this modulation of Re results in nonlinear gain and consequently distortion.

Claude
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top