Differential cross-section divergence

lonetomato
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering if anyone could explain the troubling divergence here of the differential cross-section for rutherford scattering for \theta = 0. I know it must have something to do with the fact that the em force extends to infinity, which makes sense to me for the total cross section.. Why would the differential be 0 for \theta = 0 and not over all angles?

\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} \theta = -\frac{b}{\sin \theta}\frac{db}{d\theta}

Thanks..
Anna
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome on PF,

the formula
\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \left|\frac{b}{\sin \theta}\left(\frac{db}{d\theta}\right)\right|
is not the Rutherford formula. It is hard sphere scattering, and is merely geometrical.

Rutherford formula is
\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \left(\frac{q_1q_2}{4E\sin^2 (\theta/2)}\right)^2

I have no clue whether you are referring to the optical theorem which relates the total cross section to the forward amplitude.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top