Differential Equation arising from Anharmonic Oscillator

bluesquare
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Okay, I am trying to solve this Anharmonic Oscillator equation. Now I am given with the potential
<br /> U=(1/2)x^2-(1/4)x^4<br />
and Kinetic energy
<br /> T=(1/2)x&#039; ^2<br />

So the Lagrangian becomes
\mathcal L=T-U

Now I have taken all the k's and m to be 1

Homework Equations


After solving the Lagrangian Equation I got
<br /> x&#039;&#039;(t)=-x(t)+x(t)^3<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


And when I used the solution x(t)=tanh(t/\sqrt{2}) it seems to be satisfying. But my problem is to find a general solution in where I can express my total energy as initial value condition by mentioning my energy and there by controlling how the system behaves e.g how it's position and velocity depends on total energy sort of like SHO problem where x(t)=\sqrt{2E}sin (t) and v(t)=\sqrt{2E}cos (t)

I want my Anharmonic Oscillator position and velocity to be represented like this where E and t clearly providing the initial conditions.

Thank you for the time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general solution of the nonlinear DE ##\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=-x+x^{3}## is rather complicated and has to be written in terms of elliptic functions. Are you really being asked to find it in your homework?
 
hilbert2 said:
The general solution of the nonlinear DE ##\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=-x+x^{3}## is rather complicated and has to be written in terms of elliptic functions. Are you really being asked to find it in your homework?

Yes this is my homework and I know it involves Elliptic Functions. I've tried it putting that equation In Wolfarm Alpha. It gave me back a huge solution .
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top