Differential geometry or number theory (which to take)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around choosing between differential geometry and number theory for an undergraduate PMAT degree, with a focus on their relevance for graduate school. Participants emphasize that the decision should align with personal interests and future academic goals. Differential geometry is noted to require a background in analysis, particularly if it involves manifolds, which are crucial for modern mathematics. If the course is more about curves and surfaces, it may be more accessible. In contrast, elementary number theory is considered less essential for formal study, as self-study resources like Burton's textbook are sufficient. Ultimately, a strong understanding of manifolds is recommended for those pursuing advanced mathematics.
ocohen
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi,
I'm entering my 3rd year of PMAT degree and need to make a choice between differential geometry and number theory. These are both undergrad courses. I am trying to decide which would be more interesting/useful to take. I am planning on going into grad school, so it would be nice to choose a course that would help with that.

I enjoyed the abstract algebra courses, and I haven't done analysis but it seems pretty interesting.

Any suggestions from people who have taken either or both would be appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Weird question. You're asking us which course is more interesting? That depends on your interests! You're asking which would help more regarding grad school? That depends on which direction you go to in grad school!

Anyway, if you haven't done any analysis, I don't think Differential Geometry is doable. The whole idea is that you can locally do analysis, on manifolds. Things like the implicit function theorem are important.

Unless it is some kind of course about curves and surfaces without the manifolds machinery...
 
What is a PMAT degree?
I googled it and all I found was "Pharmaceutical Microbiology Advanced Training".
 
If the NT course is elementary NT, then I don't see any need to take a course in it, the textbook by Burton's is all one needs to learn elementary NT, it's ideal for self study.

If the DG course includes manifolds, then take it without hesitation, nowdays every modern mathematician ought to know what's a manifold.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
If the NT course is elementary NT, then I don't see any need to take a course in it, the textbook by Burton's is all one needs to learn elementary NT, it's ideal for self study.

If the DG course includes manifolds, then take it without hesitation, nowdays every modern mathematician ought to know what's a manifold.

thanks that helps
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top