Differential geometry, what book is good for a first timer?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the topic of manifold theory and the prerequisites for studying it. Participants express curiosity about the terminology associated with manifolds and seek guidance on suitable introductory texts. A recommendation is made for "Calculus on Manifolds" by Spivak, which is deemed appropriate for those with a background in metric spaces and basic topology. For readers with the necessary foundational knowledge, "Differential Topology" by Guillemin and Pollack is suggested as a rigorous option that effectively proves theorems, aligning with the desire for a solid mathematical foundation.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140
I've been wanting to see what this topic is all about for awhile now. I see the word "Manifold" and other terminology floating around on the forum. It got me really curious.

I wonder what the prerequisites are to reading a book like this?

Hypothetically I have the prerequisites, what would you recommend for a first time read?

I care about how rigorous the book is in proving theorems. Something unfounded wouldn't be worth reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top