Differentiate between the two masses in equation for relativistic mass

Thread starter answerseeker
Start date Apr 11, 2005
Tags

Differentiate Mass Relativistic Relativistic mass Two masses

AI Thread Summary

In the equation for relativistic mass, m represents the mass of an object in motion, while m_0 (rest mass) is the mass of the object when it is at rest. The distinction is crucial as m increases with velocity, approaching infinity as the object's speed approaches the speed of light. Similarly, in the context of energy, E_0 refers to the rest energy, while E denotes the total energy of the object in motion. Understanding these differences is essential for grasping the principles of relativity. The relationship between rest mass and relativistic mass highlights the effects of speed on mass and energy.

Apr 11, 2005

answerseeker

how to differentiate between the two masses in equation for relativistic mass?
m= mo/sqroot 1-v^2/c^2 what's the difference between m and mo?

and what about for energy: eo and e?

Physics news on Phys.org

Apr 11, 2005

theCandyman

The mass of the object at rest is m_0 ("m not", the zero usually signifies initial state). The other m is the mass at the velocity you are traveling.

Thread 'Need help understanding particle physics and quantum physics'

So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

View full post »

Thread 'Linear generator prototype'

i want to just test a linear generator with galvanometer , the magnet is N28 and the wire (Cu) is of 0.6mm thikness and 10m long , but galvanometer dont show anthing , The core is PLA material (3d printed) The magnet size if 28mm * 10mm * 5mm

View full post »

Thread 'Fundamental Probability'

If the universe is fundamentally probabilistic, and all possible outcomes are realized in some branch of the multiverse, does that invalidate the concept of scientific inquiry? If knowledge is merely a description of one particular branch of reality, does it have any inherent value?

View full post »