Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Difficult Force problem

  1. Sep 23, 2006 #1

    This is just a force and motion problem with three unknowns, pulled out of Haliday Resnick Walker (7th Edition), Chpt. 6.

    17) An initially stationary box of sand is to be pulled across a floor by means of a cable in which the the tension should not exceed 1100 N. The coefficiient of static friction between the box and the floor is 0.35.

    (a) What should be the angle between the cable and the horizontal in order to pull the greatest possible amount of sand

    (b) What is the weight of the sand and box in that situation?

    Seems easy enough...but I can't seem to set up all the necessary equations to solve this problem.

    Here's what I have so far.

    Ok pretty staightforward, determine if the system has acceleration, I reasoned that it doesn't, therefore,

    (sum of the forces as a vector) = 0

    Ok, Now I sum the forces in x.

    (sum of the forces in x) = 0

    (sum of the forces in x) = T*cos(theta) - f_s

    (0)= F*cos(theta) - f_s

    f_s= F*cos(theta)

    (u*N) = F*cos(theta)

    And then sum them in the y.

    (sum of the forces in y) = 0

    (sum of the forces in y) = T*sin(theta) + N - W

    (0) = T*sin(theta) + N - W

    N = -T*sin(theta) + W


    W = m*g


    Ok, here are my equations.

    u*N = F*cos(theta)

    N = -T*sin(theta) + m*g

    Now from here, I see I have two equations -- three unknowns: theta, m, and N.

    I don't know what's my third equation . . .


    How, of these two equations, can I get one of the unknowns to cancel itself out and solve for at least one of my variables.

    I thought about using "tan (theta)" however

    tan(theta) = (T*sin(theta))/(T*cos(theta))

    Which reduces back to itself...

    And when I did this substituting (T*sin(theta) and (T*cos(theta)) from my earlier two equations, I still can't seem to be able to solve for at least one of the unknowns....

    Any help would be most appreciated, Thank you! :)


    u = coefficient of static friction (0.35)
    N = Normal Force
    W = weight
    T = Tension (1100 N)
    f_s = force of static friction
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 23, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    You are correct, those two equations are all you need. But look at what they mean: they are the equations that hold when the block is moving at a constant speed, when pulled at a given angle and when having a given mass. There are many angles and masses that achieve this, and what you want is the one where m is maximum. If you simplify you'll have (expression involving m and some constants) = (cos theta + mu sin theta). In order to maximize m you'll need to maximize (cos theta + mu sin theta), which can be done using the sine angle addition formula and some algebra.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2006
  4. Sep 23, 2006 #3


    User Avatar

    Or you could take the derivative of m relative to theta and make it equal to zero, to find the point of maximum.
  5. Sep 23, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    You could, but that would give you (mu cos theta - sin theta) = 0 which you'd have to solve using the cosine angle addition formula and some algebra.
  6. Sep 23, 2006 #5


    User Avatar

    The solution of that equation is simply
    tan theta = mu
    No need of any complicated algebra.
  7. Jun 20, 2008 #6

    I agree, taking the derivative is easier. dm / d(theta), when equated to zero, gives tan(theta) = [tex]\mu[/tex], so [tex]\mu[/tex] = atan .35, giving [tex]\theta[/tex] = 19.3 degrees.

    Substituting in the expression for mass, the value of the highest mass that can be pulled comes out to be 340 kg.
  8. Apr 20, 2010 #7
    I initially solved theta for this by taking the derivative of accelleration in the horizontal direction. Although the problem states that initially the box is stationary I assumed that it began moving since it was "to be pulled" across the floor. Am I wrong in taking this alternative approach?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook