- #1

eljose79

- 214

- 1

**difficult integral.....**

I have problems to calculate the integral

I(dxexp(-ax**2)), where the limits run from -infinite to infinite.

x**2+1

and a>0..can someone help?....

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter eljose79
- Start date

- #1

eljose79

- 214

- 1

I have problems to calculate the integral

I(dxexp(-ax**2)), where the limits run from -infinite to infinite.

x**2+1

and a>0..can someone help?....

- #2

If you can't figure it out, a web search for "Gaussian intregal" will reveal the clever trick.

- #3

-a dx exp x^2

- #4

quantumdude

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,575

- 23

Originally posted by damgo

Hint: the square of that integral when a=1 is equal to [inte][inte]exp(-x^2-y^2)dxdy.

I think that elijose's integral is not Gaussian, but that he meant:

[integral][-inf..+inf](exp(-ax^2)*(x^2+1)^(-1)dx

which is more difficult.

Man, I have got to learn how to post math symbols in here.

- #5

-ax^2 exp(arctan(x))

- #6

quantumdude

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,575

- 23

Originally posted by progtommlp

-ax^2 exp(arctan(x))

No.

You can take the derivative of your answer to see that it's not correct.

- #7

Oh, hmmm. Have you tried doing the contour integral over the upper half-circle?

- #8

quantumdude

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,575

- 23

1. Recognize that the integrand is even, so double the integral and reduce the range of integration from 0 to infinity.

2. Make the change of variables: u^2=x^2+1. The resulting integrand can be split into two terms, one with integrand exp(-au^2)/u^2 and one with 1/u^2. Don't forget to transform the limits of integration.

3. The second integral is elementary, while the first can be done by treating it as a function of a. Differentiate with respect to a, and the u^2 from the exponent cancels with the u^2 in the denominator (there's the trick!), and you have a Gaussian.

If it doesn't work, don't shoot me--I just thought of it. You can always try the contour integral if it doesn't work my way.

- #9

quantumdude

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,575

- 23

Originally posted by Tom

3. The second integral is elementary, while the first can be done by treating it as a function of a. Differentiate with respect to a, and the u^2 from the exponent cancels with the u^2 in the denominator (there's the trick!), and you have a Gaussian.

Oops, my mistake. You get a regular exponential, not a Gaussian. But hey, that's easier anyway.

- #10

bogdan

- 191

- 0

it has something to do with probabilities...something linked to Weibull distribution...or something...but I can't find it in a book in which I know it was...wait...a second...

Last edited:

- #11

MadHawk

- 9

- 0

Gamma integration.

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 396

- Replies
- 29

- Views
- 696

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 694

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 143

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 522

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 530

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 426

- Replies
- 21

- Views
- 735

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 552

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 469