quicksilver123
- 173
- 0
The discussion revolves around understanding the substitution rule in integration, particularly in the context of indefinite integrals. Participants are exploring the relationship between the chain rule and the substitution rule, as well as clarifying the application of Leibniz's rule in this context.
The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the substitution rule and its relationship to other rules of calculus. Some participants are seeking explicit explanations, while others are attempting to correct misunderstandings about the rules involved.
There are mentions of specific resources, such as a university webpage, which may provide additional context or proof related to integration. Participants are also reflecting on their own assumptions and notation, indicating a need for clarity in their understanding.
Sorry, I confused the chain rule and the Leibniz rule. The chain rule corresponds to the substitution rule and the Leibniz rule corresponds to integration by parts. The shortest way to see the equation in (4) is to use the notation with the ##d##'s, also called Leibniz notation. Here we get by the substitution ##g(x)=u##quicksilver123 said:Could you explicitly explain the correct method in terms of your liebnitz Rule?