Diffraction Grating and Intensity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the maximum intensity for a diffraction grating with N slits is N^2 times greater than that of a single slit. The relevant equation for intensity is provided, along with the condition that the maximum occurs at Φ=0. A key step involves using the limit of sin(Nx)/sin(x) as x approaches 0, which can be derived through a specific trigonometric identity. The participants clarify the manipulation of the equation, leading to a better understanding of the proof. Ultimately, the original poster expresses gratitude for the assistance and confirms their comprehension of the topic.
silence98
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the maximum intensity for a diffraction grating of N slits at the first principal maximum is N^2 times bigger than for a single slit.


Homework Equations



I=I(0)[sin^2(NB)/sin^2(B)] where B is (\pidsin\phi)/\lambda


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel i understand the concepts here but this question has stumped me. I've scoured the internet, read through the relevant chapters in my two textbooks and still i can't see how this would be proven. It is just stated in my lecture notes, is it that intuitive?

I really would be grateful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The maximum is at Φ=0. You have to start with the limit sin(x)/x when x tends to 0. Find the limit of sin(Nx)/sin(x). Use that sin(Nx)/sin(x)=[sin(Nx)/Nx] N [x/sin(x)].

ehild
 
ehild said:
The maximum is at Φ=0. You have to start with the limit sin(x)/x when x tends to 0. Find the limit of sin(Nx)/sin(x). Use that sin(Nx)/sin(x)=[sin(Nx)/Nx] N [x/sin(x)].

ehild

Thanks for the help, but i don't really understand the bolded part. I haven't seen that trig identity before and i can't see how it would be found.
 
It is just multiplying both the numerator and the denominator with the same quantity and rearranging.

\frac{\sin(Nx)}{\sin(x)}=\frac{Nx\sin(Nx)}{Nx\sin(x)}=\frac{\sin(Nx)}{Nx} N \frac{x}{\sin(x)}

ehild
 
ehild said:
It is just multiplying both the numerator and the denominator with the same quantity and rearranging.

\frac{\sin(Nx)}{\sin(x)}=\frac{Nx\sin(Nx)}{Nx\sin(x)}=\frac{\sin(Nx)}{Nx} N \frac{x}{\sin(x)}

ehild

Thankyou, and i apologise for my stupidity!

I've got it now.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top