Diffraction grating, distances between maxima

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the separation between the second-order maxima for two wavelengths (590 nm and 680 nm) using a diffraction grating with a line density of 10^10 cm−1. The approach involves determining the angular distance for each wavelength using the formula θ = arcsin(2λ/d) and then calculating the vertical distance on the screen using sin(θ) = y/L. However, confusion arises regarding the correct method to find the separation between the two maxima, as participants emphasize the need to calculate the difference in the y positions for each wavelength. The final consensus suggests that while the method is conceptually sound, the angles calculated may not be small enough for the sine and tangent approximations to hold true. Accurate results depend on careful consideration of these angles in the calculations.
TheKShaugh
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A grating has a line density of 1010 cm−1, and a screen perpendicular to the ray that makes the central peak of the diffraction pattern is 2.5 m from the grating. If light of two wavelengths, 590 nm and 680 nm, passes through the grating, what is the separation on the (flat) screen between the second-order maxima for the two wavelengths?

Homework Equations



dsin\theta = m \lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the angular distance to the second order maxima covered by each wavelength:

\theta = arcsin(\frac{2 \lambda}{d}) where d is \frac{1}{1010}\times 10^{-2}

Then I would take the difference, and plug it into the equation sin\theta = \frac{y}{L} and solve for y. This gives me the wrong answer but I don't see why this wouldn't work. Can anyone see my mistake?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheKShaugh said:

Homework Statement



A grating has a line density of 1010 cm−1, and a screen perpendicular to the ray that makes the central peak of the diffraction pattern is 2.5 m from the grating. If light of two wavelengths, 590 nm and 680 nm, passes through the grating, what is the separation on the (flat) screen between the second-order maxima for the two wavelengths?

Homework Equations



dsin\theta = m \lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the angular distance to the second order maxima covered by each wavelength:

\theta = arcsin(\frac{2 \lambda}{d}) where d is \frac{1}{1010}\times 10^{-2}

Then I would take the difference, and plug it into the equation sin\theta = \frac{y}{L} and solve for y.

Take the difference of what?
You have two wavelengths, two angles and two y positions. You need the separation between the positions, that is, the difference of the y-s.
 
ehild said:
Take the difference of what?
You have two wavelengths, two angles and two y positions. You need the separation between the positions, that is, the difference of the y-s.

What I meant was that I would solve for the angular spread of the second order maxima for one wavelength, then the other, and the take the difference of those two values. What I get should be the angular distance between the two maxima. I could then use the equation I gave in my OP and solve. This gives the same answer that I got: 2.5sin(7.896)-2.5sin(6.845) The idea is that if I calculate the angle to one maxima, I should be able to tell what vertical distance it covers. Then I can do the same for the other maxima, and take the difference between those two distances as the distance from one maxima to another.
 
It is a good method, what result did you get? In principle, the distance of the maximum from the centre is L tan(θ). If θ is really small, the sine and the tangent are nearly equal. But the angles you got are not small enough.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top