Diffraction grating, distances between maxima

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the separation between the second-order maxima for two wavelengths (590 nm and 680 nm) using a diffraction grating with a line density of 10^10 cm−1. The approach involves determining the angular distance for each wavelength using the formula θ = arcsin(2λ/d) and then calculating the vertical distance on the screen using sin(θ) = y/L. However, confusion arises regarding the correct method to find the separation between the two maxima, as participants emphasize the need to calculate the difference in the y positions for each wavelength. The final consensus suggests that while the method is conceptually sound, the angles calculated may not be small enough for the sine and tangent approximations to hold true. Accurate results depend on careful consideration of these angles in the calculations.
TheKShaugh
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A grating has a line density of 1010 cm−1, and a screen perpendicular to the ray that makes the central peak of the diffraction pattern is 2.5 m from the grating. If light of two wavelengths, 590 nm and 680 nm, passes through the grating, what is the separation on the (flat) screen between the second-order maxima for the two wavelengths?

Homework Equations



dsin\theta = m \lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the angular distance to the second order maxima covered by each wavelength:

\theta = arcsin(\frac{2 \lambda}{d}) where d is \frac{1}{1010}\times 10^{-2}

Then I would take the difference, and plug it into the equation sin\theta = \frac{y}{L} and solve for y. This gives me the wrong answer but I don't see why this wouldn't work. Can anyone see my mistake?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheKShaugh said:

Homework Statement



A grating has a line density of 1010 cm−1, and a screen perpendicular to the ray that makes the central peak of the diffraction pattern is 2.5 m from the grating. If light of two wavelengths, 590 nm and 680 nm, passes through the grating, what is the separation on the (flat) screen between the second-order maxima for the two wavelengths?

Homework Equations



dsin\theta = m \lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would find the angular distance to the second order maxima covered by each wavelength:

\theta = arcsin(\frac{2 \lambda}{d}) where d is \frac{1}{1010}\times 10^{-2}

Then I would take the difference, and plug it into the equation sin\theta = \frac{y}{L} and solve for y.

Take the difference of what?
You have two wavelengths, two angles and two y positions. You need the separation between the positions, that is, the difference of the y-s.
 
ehild said:
Take the difference of what?
You have two wavelengths, two angles and two y positions. You need the separation between the positions, that is, the difference of the y-s.

What I meant was that I would solve for the angular spread of the second order maxima for one wavelength, then the other, and the take the difference of those two values. What I get should be the angular distance between the two maxima. I could then use the equation I gave in my OP and solve. This gives the same answer that I got: 2.5sin(7.896)-2.5sin(6.845) The idea is that if I calculate the angle to one maxima, I should be able to tell what vertical distance it covers. Then I can do the same for the other maxima, and take the difference between those two distances as the distance from one maxima to another.
 
It is a good method, what result did you get? In principle, the distance of the maximum from the centre is L tan(θ). If θ is really small, the sine and the tangent are nearly equal. But the angles you got are not small enough.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top