Diffraction of individual photons

gespex
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

If we have any setup that causes diffraction with light, such as a single slit, and count the number of photons detected at a certain point behind this slit, is it true that we can determine this count as follows:
1. Consider each point in the slits a new wave source, and calculate for the detected point the amplitude, A, of the sum of all these new waves.
2. The number of detected photons will be proportional to the square of this amplitude, so proportional to A^2.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe photon number N is not an invariant quantity except for Fock states.
 
If you are talking about the average or expected photon count (not necessarily exact count) then yes, it should be right what you wrote.
 
Thanks for the replies, but which of the two is it ;-)? Zarqon: yes, I mean the average/expected photon count. So who of you two is right? Or both: I'm not sure what Fock states are, so maybe Zarqon considered that to be implicit?
 
Fock state = exact photon number is known (but the phase of the light is not)

chill_factor simply pointed out that you will not be able to get the exact photon number unless you prepare your light in a very particular state (and Fock states are generally difficult to create). And then I continued on that saying, what you wrote is ok if you don't need the exact photon count, but are happy with the average. So there was no disagreement. Hope that clears it up.
 
Ok, got it, thanks!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top