Diffraction on a body centered lattice, h+k+l even?

Tom83B
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
This is in my book:

exp[2\pi i(hx+ky+lz)][1+exp(\pi i(h+k+l))]=2exp[2\pi i(hx+ky+lz)]\cos^2[\frac{\pi}{2}(h+k+l)]

And in order for the cosine not to be zero, h+k+l must be even when we want to see the reflection.

But I think that the result should be exp[2\pi i(hx+ky+lz)](2\cos^2[\frac{\pi}{2}(h+k+l)]+i\sin[\pi(h+k+l)])
Why isn't the imaginary part there? My idea was that we only need the real part, but because we multiply two complex numbers, I can't do this because i^2=-1, can I?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That does seem strange. What is this equation supposed to be anyway? For what purpose is the author converting the exponential to trig functions? Also, I recognize the (1+exp) factor as the structure factor for BCC, but I can't remember ever seeing it multiplied by a second exponential that way.
 
What is the sine of an integer multiple of pi?
 
Modulated said:
What is the sine of an integer multiple of pi?

Thank you very much :-)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top