Diffraction related to Resolving Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter wizzleman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of light emitted from a car's taillights based on diffraction principles. The initial calculation yielded a wavelength of 5.035x10^-7 meters, which is in the visible spectrum but corresponds to a bluish-green color, unusual for taillights. Participants suggest that adjusting for the index of refraction could yield a more realistic wavelength. The formula used for the calculation is d=(1.22λy)/D, where d is the distance between the taillights, D is the pupil diameter, and y is the distance to the car. Incorporating the index of refraction is crucial for obtaining an accurate result.
wizzleman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car passes you on the highway and you notice the taillights of the car are 1.22 m apart. Assume that the pupils of your eyes have a diameter of 7.1 mm and index of refraction of 1.36. Given that the car is 14.1 km away when the taillights appear to merge into a single spot of light because of the effects of diffraction, what wavelength of light does the car emit from its taillights (what would the wavelength be in vacuum)?

Homework Equations



I tried using

d=(1.22λy)/D

where d = 1.22m, D = 7.1mm, y=14.1km

The Attempt at a Solution



I got 5.035x10^-7 as my answer but SmartPhysics keeps on saying that I'm off by a power of ten and I've cycled between negative options but I can't get the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

A couple of things seem odd. If you changed your answer by a power of 10, the wavelength would no longer be in the visible portion of the spectrum.

Your answer is in the visible range, but it corresponds to a bluish-green color (odd for tail lights). See http://www.gamonline.com/catalog/colortheory/visible.php

If you include the effect of the index of refraction, I think you'll get an answer that's much more realistic for tail lights.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top