Diffraction With A Single Slit And A Lens.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of diffraction maxima and the width of the diffraction pattern produced by a single slit and a lens. Key parameters include a wavelength of 500 nm, a slit width of 2.8 μm, and a lens focal length of 100 mm. The irradiance formula derived is I(θ) = I0 sin²(β)/(β²), with conditions for minima given by b sin(θ) = mλ. The user is uncertain about how to incorporate the lens into their calculations and seeks clarification on determining the total width of the pattern and the number of maxima. Assistance is requested to resolve these uncertainties in the context of diffraction theory.
chris_avfc
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Trying to find the number of diffraction maxima and the width of the whole pattern.
\lambda = 500nm
b = 2.8μm (Slit Width)
f = 100mm
r = 25mm
L = 25mm (Slit to Lens)

Homework Equations



I have the worked out the irradiance formula as:

I(\theta)=I_0 sin^2(\beta)/(\beta^2)

The conditions for minima

b sin\theta = m\lambda

Angular width of central fringe

\Delta\theta \approx 2\lambda/b

Width of central fringe

W \approx 2L\lambda/b

The Attempt at a Solution



As said I worked out the irradiance formula, and I think to find the width of the whole pattern you would do:

(Fringe Width \times 2) + 1

As then it accounts for the dark fringes as well, plus the one extra for the central.

As for working out the number of maxima, I would guess it would involve the condition for a minimum as it contains the order of diffraction.

What really throws me off though, is the lens, I'm not sure what that would do for the calculations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry to bump this, but does anybody have any idea?
 
Going to be a pain and see if anyone can help me again?

Can't get anywhere with this. :(
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top