Diffusion of energy by heat flow

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the heat diffusion equation from the heat flow equation in one dimension. The heat flow equation is given by j_H = -κ ∂_x T, where κ represents thermal conductivity. The internal energy per unit volume is expressed as u = ρCT, linking temperature to energy density. The challenge lies in substituting this relationship into the heat flow equation and correctly deriving the diffusion equation ∂_t T = D_H ∂^2_x T, while determining that D_H depends on κ, C, and ρ. Participants suggest using Taylor expansion to approximate temperature changes in neighboring elements to facilitate the derivation.
Nacho Verdugo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This problem belongs to the Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology, Hobbie Chapter 4.

The heat flow equation in one dimension

$$ j_H=-\kappa \partial_x T $$

where ## \kappa ## is the termal conductivity in ## Wm^{-1}K^{-1}##. One often finds an equation for the diffusion of energy by heat flow:

$$ \partial_t T=D_H \partial^2_x T $$

The units of ## j_H## are ## Jm^{-2}s^{-1}##. The internal energy per unit volumen is given by ##u=\rho CT##, where C is the heat capacity per unit mass and ##\rho## is the density of the material. Derive the second equation from the first and show ## D_H ## depends on ## \kappa, C## and ##\rho##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I tried this:

As ## u=\rho CT ##, I can write the temperature as ##T=\frac{u}{C\rho}##, so in the first equation:

$$ j_H=-\kappa \partial_x \left( \frac{u}{C\rho} \right) $$

and rewriting this and replacing it in the second equation:

$$\partial_t T=D_H\partial_x(j_H/\kappa) $$

which is similar to

$$\partial_t T=D_H \partial_x \partial_x ({u}{C\rho}) $$

but I got stucked here because I can't derivate this. Any ideas on how to move on?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nacho Verdugo said:
rewriting this and replacing it in the second equation:
The second equation is the thing to be proved, no? So you cannot use it in the proof.
Consider a small element at position x length dx, temperature T(x,t). Neighbouring elements are at temperatures T(x-dx, t) and T(x+dx, t).
What is the heat flow into the element from each neighbour? Approximate T(x-dx, t) etc. using the usual f(x+dx)=f(x)+f'(x)dx+ ... rule, but taking into account the second order terms.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top