Digital holography - why not 3d?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of achieving a true 3D effect in digital holography using CCD and Fourier transforms. Users note that while they can recreate the object, it appears 2D rather than 3D, likely due to limitations in printer or screen resolution. There is a consensus that to achieve the desired 3D effect, one must print the interference pattern and illuminate it with the reference ray, rather than simply processing the image. Additionally, the conversation highlights the importance of using high-resolution printers capable of handling the intricate details of holography. Ultimately, the key to successful digital holography lies in accurately reproducing the interference pattern for proper illumination.
fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
after applying Fourier transform on the interference picture i get from the object ray and the reference ray (which i captured with a high definition CCD), i can see the object again... but it doesn't look like a hologram to me... its pretty 2d dimensional looking... my guess is that my printer\screen resolution is too low for the effect to take effect... am i right?

if i'd use a better printer, will i be able to see my object (almost) is three dimensions? is there a printer with a high enough resolution?
(or is it because of another factor which i didn't take into consideration?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that you need to supply more details of your experiment. In any event, I seriously doubt that any monitor or printer can created the resolution needed to duplicate photonic wave interference.
 
im spliting a laser beam into an object beam and a reference beam, the object beam is reflected from an object and interferes with the reference beam on the CCD, so that now i can deduce the phase difference of the reflected object beam and recreate the wave front as if it came from the object.

in optical holography this deduction of phase difference is made by illuminating the interference picture again with the laser that was used to create the picture (and at the same angle that was used).
because i use CCD, i use Fourier transform on my picture to get the same result, mathematically it should be identicle, but i don't get the 3d effect i would have gotten by using the optical method... my CCD is accurate enough, i calculated the real optical resolution considering the airy-disc size and my CCD has more then enough, so i think i lose the effect when i try to view the picture on a computer screen or a piece of paper.
 
nevermind, i was wrong, i don't need to print the picture i get after processing the image, i need to print the interference pattern and illuminate it with the reference ray, there are printer capable of doing it.

alternatively i can produce a picture of the object from a variaty of angles on the computer using the interfernce picture.
 
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought from the beginning that it was the interference pattern that you were trying to print. Might I assume that you're doing it on transparencies?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top