Digital Modulation onto Electromagnetic waves

AI Thread Summary
Commercial satellite uplinks achieve higher bandwidth rates than HAM OSCAR uplinks primarily due to differences in frequency and modulation techniques. While all electromagnetic waves travel at the same speed, higher frequency bands allow for greater data capacity and more advanced modulation schemes. Digital modulation methods, such as QPSK or 8PSK, can significantly increase data rates compared to simpler methods used in amateur radio. The discussion highlights the importance of carrier frequency and data rate in determining overall performance. Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing data transmission in various applications.
WarrickF
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I was hoping someone could explain why commercial satellite uplinks (like those used in TV broadcast) are able to achieve such high bandwidth rates vs. radio uplinks like HAM OSCAR uplinks.

I don’t completely understand how digital modulation is done onto radio wave, but at 1st glance on would think that since all electromagnetic waves travel at the same speed, that you’d be able to modulate an equal amount of data into the wave.

I understand that the frequency must play a role, but one would imagine that the form of modulation in use could be modified to accommodate the frequency in use and achieve the same rate.

I’m clearly missing something though as I’m sure someone would have done this by now.

Thanks
Warrick
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here's a good intro to modulation schemes at wikipedia.org:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation

What are the carrier frequency and data rate of the HAM OSCAR link? Most HAM stuff that I deal with (voice and packet) is at audio rates, without any compression to speak of.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top