Digital Modulation onto Electromagnetic waves

AI Thread Summary
Commercial satellite uplinks achieve higher bandwidth rates than HAM OSCAR uplinks primarily due to differences in frequency and modulation techniques. While all electromagnetic waves travel at the same speed, higher frequency bands allow for greater data capacity and more advanced modulation schemes. Digital modulation methods, such as QPSK or 8PSK, can significantly increase data rates compared to simpler methods used in amateur radio. The discussion highlights the importance of carrier frequency and data rate in determining overall performance. Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing data transmission in various applications.
WarrickF
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

I was hoping someone could explain why commercial satellite uplinks (like those used in TV broadcast) are able to achieve such high bandwidth rates vs. radio uplinks like HAM OSCAR uplinks.

I don’t completely understand how digital modulation is done onto radio wave, but at 1st glance on would think that since all electromagnetic waves travel at the same speed, that you’d be able to modulate an equal amount of data into the wave.

I understand that the frequency must play a role, but one would imagine that the form of modulation in use could be modified to accommodate the frequency in use and achieve the same rate.

I’m clearly missing something though as I’m sure someone would have done this by now.

Thanks
Warrick
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here's a good intro to modulation schemes at wikipedia.org:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation

What are the carrier frequency and data rate of the HAM OSCAR link? Most HAM stuff that I deal with (voice and packet) is at audio rates, without any compression to speak of.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...

Similar threads

Back
Top