Dilution Factors, Determining Molarity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molarity of Fe3+ and NO3- in a diluted iron (III) nitrate solution. The scientist prepares a 100 mL solution using 4.8372 grams of Fe(NO3)3, resulting in a concentration of 0.0004999 M for Fe3+. After pipetting 5 mL into a 20 mL flask and diluting it by a factor of 100, the molarity of NO3- is calculated to be three times that of Fe3+, resulting in 0.0014997 M. Participants clarify the application of dilution factors and the importance of total volume in molarity calculations. The final concentrations are confirmed, with minor discrepancies noted in molar mass calculations.
Spartan Erik
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A scientist prepares 100 mL of an iron (III) nitrate solution by weighing out 4.8372 grams of the solid iron (III) nitrate and dissolving it in deionized water using a 100 mL volumetric flask. She then pipettes 5 mL of that solution into a 20 mL volumetric flask and fills it to the mark, then dilutes the resulting solution by a factor of 100. What are the molarities of Fe3+ (aq) and NO3- (aq) in the final solution? Show your work."

Homework Equations



Molarity = moles / liter
M1V1 = M2V2

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe there are two ways to solve this (correct me if I'm wrong)

1. Raw calculation:
Well it starts off with 100 mL of deionized water added to 4.8372g of Fe(NO3)3. That solution will be 0.048372g Fe(NO3)3 / mL of H2O. She takes 5 mL of that solution (0.048372g/mL x 5 mL = 0.012093 g of Fe(NO3)3), and then dilutes it by a factor of 100. A dilution factor of 100 is the same as 99 mL of H2O and 1 mL of solution correct?

Not sure how I would apply the dilution factor .. would it just be 0.012093g of Fe(NO3)3 / 99 mL H2O?

2. I imagine M1V1 = M2V2 could provide a shortcut..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spartan Erik said:
A dilution factor of 100 is the same as 99 mL of H2O and 1 mL of solution correct?

Yes.

Not sure how I would apply the dilution factor .. would it just be 0.012093g of Fe(NO3)3 / 99 mL H2O?

Why 99 mL? What is volume after mixing 99+1?

And don't forget to convert it to molarity now.

2. I imagine M1V1 = M2V2 could provide a shortcut..

Not a shortcut - exactly the same amount of work. One part is molarity calculation (just done at the beginning), the other - calculation of all dilution steps.

Don't forget final concentrations of Fe3+ and NO3- will be different.
 
Oh so to account for total volume it must be 0.012093g of Fe(NO3)3 / 100 mL H2O?

So therefore, 0.00012093g of Fe(NO3)3/mL of H2O, which is the same as 0.12093g of Fe(NO3)3/L of H2O

Molar mass of Fe(NO3)3 is.. 241.8602 g/mol, so:

0.12093g Fe(NO3)3 / L x 1 mol / 241.8602g = 0.0004999 mol / L

So the Fe(NO3)3 will be 0.0004999M. Molarity of Fe will be 0.0004999M, and the molarity of NO3 will be 0.0004999M x 3 I believe since there are three NO3's for one Fe.

Informing me of any mistakes along this pathway would be greatly appreciated :)
 
I got 241.8597 for molar mass, which leads to 5.000 instead of 4.999. Otherwise looks OK.
 
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top