How Does Dimensional Analysis Apply to Fermat's Last Theorem and Beyond?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Antonio Lao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension
AI Thread Summary
Dimensional analysis applied to Fermat's Last Theorem reveals that for n=2, the equation a^n + b^n = c^n holds true, exemplified by the Pythagorean triple 3, 4, 5. As n increases beyond 2, the right-hand side (RHS) of the equation becomes larger than the left-hand side (LHS), leading to the conclusion that at n=infinity, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Conversely, for n less than 2, the LHS exceeds the RHS, and fractional values of n further diminish the RHS. The discussion emphasizes the exploration of mathematical concepts beyond traditional boundaries, despite some dissent regarding the validity of the conclusions drawn. Overall, the analysis invites consideration of the implications of dimensionality in mathematical logic.
Antonio Lao
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
1
What is done in the following might be considered as “not mathematical.” Nevertheless we must be allowed to use crazy ideas if only for the sake of exploring the uncharted domains of human mathematical logic.

This is not to prove again the famous math problem called Fermat’s Last Theorem. The proof was done by Andrew Wiles in the 1990s. But use it in relation to dimensional analysis.

The algebraic equation is a^n +b^n = c^n The exponential number n, in our discussion, is the dimension. For the case where n=2, the equation is called the Pythagorean theorem and its solutions are the Pythagorean triples. For our purpose, we only need one of these triples: a=3, b=4, c=5. The equations becomes 3^2+4^2=5^2. The left-hand (LHS) side is always equal to the right-hand side (RHS).

When n=3, the RHS is bigger than the LHS. When n=4, the RHS is even bigger than the LHS. It can be noted that, as n increases from 2 to infinity, the RHS becomes progressively bigger and bigger. We can make the conclusion that at n=infinity, the principle of holism is vindicated. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. And no matter how many parts are added together, the sum is always less than the whole.

Likewise, it can be shown that if n is less than 2, the reverse happens, the RHS becomes smaller than the LHS. And if we allow n to take on fractional value, the RHS becomes progressively smaller and smaller than the LHS. So that when n=0, the quantum nature of number becomes apparent (1 + 1 > 1).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Antonio Lao

Well spoken Antonio.
 
Originally posted by Antonio Lao

When n=3, the RHS is bigger than the LHS. When n=4, the RHS is even bigger than the LHS. It can be noted that, as n increases from 2 to infinity, the RHS becomes progressively bigger and bigger. We can make the conclusion that at n=infinity, the principle of holism is vindicated. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

No. The only conclusion that can be drawn is that 3^n +4^n = 5^n is not true for n\neq 2.
 
Thanks for all your replies.

For the next discussion is that of an n-sphere and an n-cube.
What spatial dimension makes their volumes equal?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top