Dimensional Analysis - waves and surface tension question

kapitan90
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In some cases waves on deep water are driven by surface tension effects and not by gravity. The surface tension is the energy per unit area of the water surface.
The area of the water surface increases by a factor proportional to (Ak)^2 in the presence of a wave amplitude A and wavenumber k. Say whether you would expect surface tension effects to dominate over gravitational effects when the wavenumber is small or large. Give your reasons.


2. Homework Equations and the attempted solution
In the previous part of the question I found the dimension of the surface tension to be M*T^{-2}. I also found the phase velocity to be equal to v=c*\sqrt{\frac{y*k}{d}} where y - surface tension k - wavenumber, d - density, c - some constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For small wavenumbers, the phase velocity is large which means that the surface tension effects would dominate over gravitational effects. This is because for large phase velocities, the energy associated with the wave is mainly due to surface tension and not gravity. On the other hand, for large wavenumbers, the phase velocity is small. This means that the energy associated with the wave is mainly due to gravity and not surface tension. Therefore, in this case, gravitational effects would dominate over the surface tension effects.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top