Diodes in parallel with resistors and terminal PD

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of diodes in parallel with resistors in a circuit. When one diode is reversed, it allows current to pass through while the other does not, resulting in a voltage drop of 0.6V across the conducting diode and its associated resistor. If both diodes are oriented to allow current flow, they would theoretically share the voltage, but this could lead to excessive current and potential diode failure. The conversation highlights the complexity of diode behavior, emphasizing that the total voltage must equal the battery voltage, and that the 0.6V drop is a rough approximation. Overall, the participants express a preference for simpler circuit components like resistors and bulbs over diodes.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
1.

diode_zpsbf4b87a5.jpg

Homework Statement

The problem is not answering the questions, as supplied by the book
The book then asks you to reverse both diodes, so you still have one diode in the circuit that let's current pass through it and one that does not.
When you solve for the PD at Q you use the 0.6V of the diode and therefore because parallel the 10kOhm resistor also gets 0.6V so therefore the resistor at P gets 3.0-0.6=2.4V the rest of the 3V terminal PD

My question is what happens if we only reverse 1 diode, so that both are now in the same direction as conventional current flow.

Homework Equations



My understanding that a diode will only take the 0.6V then the current will flow through it.
Also the same PD will be across any branch of a parallel oart of a circuit

The Attempt at a Solution



If both resistors and diodes only get 0.6 volts each than the total circuit voltage is only 1.2V

Is this correct?
Any ideas welcomed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is not correct. The total voltage must equal the battery voltage. Note that one of the diodes will be conducting, the other will not.
 
Integral said:
No, it is not correct. The total voltage must equal the battery voltage. Note that one of the diodes will be conducting, the other will not.

Thanks for responding Integral
I am happy that in the circuit above the diode at X let's current flow through it at 0.6V and therefore the 10kOhms resistor at Q has this 0.6V across it as well.
Then the other diode at Y does not so the 5kOhm resistor at P has the rest of the PD at 2.4V

If I change the circuit to this one below by turning the diode Y the other way, by the logic above why do they not both now only get 0.6V

diode2_zps90f703c9.jpg

I am as dumb as I look
Thank you
 
The 0.6V rule-of-thumb for diodes is a very rough approximation that holds at modest current levels. It is possible to go higher in voltage, but the resulting currents will be enormous and in practice will burn out the diode.

A more sophisticated model of a diode's voltage-current relation is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode#Shockley_diode_equation

That is, current through a diode increases roughly exponentially with voltage. It might increase by a factor of 10 for every 0.05 to 0.1 V increase (if my memory is correct), and over a wide range of operating currents the voltage will be somewhere between 0.5 and 0.8 V.
 
Thanks RedBelly98
So if we just had the two diodes and the 3V cell they would both get 1.5V and a large current would flow that would burn them out?

If we have the two diodes and two resistor in the second case then because there is a resistor in parallel in series with each other we would get voltage drops across the two resisitors with the 10kOhm receiving more of the voltage to push the same current through

cant we just stick to bulbs and resistors!
 
mrcotton said:
Thanks RedBelly98
So if we just had the two diodes and the 3V cell they would both get 1.5V and a large current would flow that would burn them out?
Yes. (Assuming they are identical diodes.)
If we have the two diodes and two resistor in the second case then because there is a resistor in parallel in series with each other we would get voltage drops across the two resisitors with the 10kOhm receiving more of the voltage to push the same current through
The 10Ω resistor would have slightly more voltage than the 5k. I don't think "pushing the same current through" is an adequate description of what is going on though.
cant we just stick to bulbs and resistors!
Most intro physics courses (i.e., high school or college freshman level) do not deal with diodes.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top