I Dirac Matrices and the Pythagorean Theorem

Bob Dylan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I understand that momentum, rest mass and energy can be put on the sides of a right triangle such that the Pythagorean Theorem suggests E^2=p^2+m^2. I understand that the Dirac equation says E=aypy+axpx+azpz+Bm and that when we square both sides the momentum and mass terms square while the cross terms cancel because the matrices square to one and anti-commute. I can follow the mathematics; however, I don't understand this at a more visual, intuitive level. Is it possible to retain the understanding of these terms being on a triangle? If so it seems like A^2+B^2=C^2 has gone to A+B=C and I don't see how that could describe any right triangle.

Please help me understand, as visually as possible, what's happening to Einstein's triangle as the Dirac matrices are applied.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of your A and B as orthogonal vectors. What do you get if you add them?
 
Got it. Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top