Direction of Displacement Vector [2D Kinematics]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a 2D kinematics problem involving displacement vectors. The first question is correctly solved, with the resultant displacement calculated as 20.1 km. For the second question, participants discuss the correct approach to find the direction of the displacement vector using trigonometric functions, specifically the arctangent. There is confusion regarding the counter-clockwise angular direction and its limits, prompting suggestions to visualize the problem on a Cartesian plane. The conversation emphasizes using the Pythagorean theorem and trigonometric identities to clarify the solution process.
stickyriceyum
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question 1 [Correctly Solved]
A pedestrian moves 2.1km east and then 20km north. Find the magnitude of the resultant displacement vector. Answer in units of km.

Answer = 20.1km

Question 2
What is the direction of the displacement vector (using the counter-clockwise angular direction to be positive, within the limits of -180 degrees = 180 degrees)? Answer in units of degrees/

The Attempt at a Solution



[Theta] = (arctan) (Ay/Ax)
[Theta] = (arctan) 20km/2.1km = 1.466

------

I'm probably using the wrong equation. :x
(using the counter-clockwise angular direction to be positive, within the limits of -180 degrees = 180 degrees) Also, I don't understand what that means. Will someone please explain? :blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
question #1: Draw it on a sheet of paper, make a Cartesian plane, use the upper y-axis as north, right x-axis as east. You ll remember something!
*hint* Pythagorean Theorem ;)

Question #2: now I am not sure if ill explain this right but! i think that this : "using the counter-clockwise angular direction to be positive, within the limits of -180 degrees = 180 degrees" means find the angle opposite to the 20km line (i think its the angle between the hypotenus and the 2.1km line)
Let's say it is ;)
now remember SOHCAHTOA and see if you can do it.

Got more questions, just PM me. Goodluck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top