Direction of field intensity .?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the term "electric field intensity" in relation to determining the direction of the electric field at a specific point on an equipotential line. Participants clarify that "electric field intensity" typically refers to the magnitude of the electric field, which is a scalar quantity and does not have direction. The focus should instead be on identifying the vector that represents the direction of the electric field at point x. The correct choice will be the vector that is perpendicular to the equipotential line, as electric fields point from high to low potential. Overall, the terminology used in the question is misleading and should be clarified.
<---
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Direction of field intensity...?

Problem:
"The vector that best describes the direction of the electric field intensity at point x on the 200Volt equipotential line is"?... ...(five multiple choice options)

There is a diagram of decreasing/increasing equipotentail lines with a point "x" on one which from four vectors are going, two parallel to the line and two perpendicular.

I know the answer they want, so I think I know what they mean( what direction is the electric field vector in).
My question is with the wording, "direction of the electric field intensity".
Does this even make any sense?
From what I understand "electric field intensity" is the magnitude of the electric field at that point. So it is just a scaler and does not have a direction...
Or am I missing/misunderstanding something?
----------------
Now playing: Nine Inch Nails - Head Like A Hole (Soil)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The term "electric field intensity" does not make sense in this context. The vector that best describes the direction of the electric field at point x is the one that you need to select from the multiple choice options.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top