Direction of polarization for monochromatic wave?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct direction of the electric and magnetic fields for a monochromatic plane wave with specific parameters. The user initially attempts to define the unit vectors for the electric field (n) and wave vector (k) but struggles with the normalization factors of sqrt(2) and sqrt(3) provided in the solutions manual. It is emphasized that the unit vector must have a magnitude of one and be perpendicular to the wave vector, leading to the need for additional equations to solve for the unknown components of n. The conversation highlights the importance of using the orthogonality condition between the vectors to find the correct values. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately representing the wave's polarization and direction.
magnesium12
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Write down the (real) electric and magnetic fields for a monochromatic plane wave of amplitude Eo, frequency w, and phase angle zero traveling in the direction from the origin to the point (1,1,1) with polarization parallel to the xz plane.

I understand how to write the equations, I just don't understand how to get the correct direction for the electric and magnetic fields.

Homework Equations


## E(z,t) = E_o\cos(\hat k \cdot \hat r - \omega t) \hat n ##
## B(z,t) = \frac{E_o}{c}\cos(\hat k \cdot \hat r - \omega t) ( \hat k x \hat n) ##
## k = -\frac{\omega}{c} ##
## \hat n \cdot \hat k = 0 ##

The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I did:

## \hat n = \hat x + \hat z ##
## \hat k = \frac{\omega}{c} (\hat x + \hat y + \hat z) ##

So I thought that was all I was supposed to do to find the direction, but the solutions manual says these are the actual directions of n and k:

## \hat n =\frac { \hat x - \hat z}{\sqrt{2}} ##
## \hat k = \frac{\omega}{c} \frac{(\hat x + \hat y + \hat z)}{\sqrt{3}} ##

So where did those factors of sqrt(2) and sqrt(3) come from?
I appreciate any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, the question asks you to find the unit vector, so the magnitude of the vector which is supposed to be the answer should be unity. Second, you only know that ##\hat{n}## only has components along ##\hat{x}## and ##\hat{z}## but you are not given the length of each component, these are what you should calculate subject to the condition that the length of ##\hat{n}## is unity and that this vector is perpendicular to ##\hat{k}##.
 
  • Like
Likes magnesium12
blue_leaf77 said:
First, the question asks you to find the unit vector, so the magnitude of the vector which is supposed to be the answer should be unity. Second, you only know that ##\hat{n}## only has components along ##\hat{x}## and ##\hat{z}## but you are not given the length of each component, these are what you should calculate subject to the condition that the length of ##\hat{n}## is unity and that this vector is perpendicular to ##\hat{k}##.

I don't think I understand.
So I would do
## n = \sqrt(a^2 + b^2)) = 1## Therefore: ##a^2= 1-b^2##
## k = \sqrt(c^2 + d^2 + e^2) = 1##
And then use this somehow:
## \hat n \cdot \hat k = nkcos\theta = 0##
## nkcos\theta = \sqrt((1-b^2) + b^2)\sqrt(c^2 + d^2 + e^2)cos\theta##
But since n = 1 and k =1, wouldn't that just leave me with nothing again?
 
If ##\mathbf{k}## is denoted such that it has components ##c##, ##d##, and ##e## then they must be known already since the problem tells you that ##\mathbf{k}## goes from the origin to the point (1,1,1). What you don't know yet are just ##a## and ##b##, i.e. two unknowns. You have figured out one equation relating these unknowns, which is
magnesium12 said:
## n = \sqrt(a^2 + b^2)) = 1## Therefore: ##a^2= 1-b^2##
.
The other equation you need is the orthogonality condition between ##\mathbf{k}## and ##\hat{n}##. To do this, it will be easier with component-by-component multiplication instead of the one like ##kn\cos \theta##.
 
  • Like
Likes magnesium12
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top