Direction of rotation of a direct current motor

AI Thread Summary
In a direct current motor, the direction of rotation is determined by the alignment of the magnetic field and the current direction, making it impossible for the coil to move in both directions without altering these factors. The motor may perform better in one direction due to the effects of armature reaction, which distorts the magnetic field and affects the neutral plane. When the armature coils move parallel to the magnetic field, the commutator must reverse the current to maintain motion. Additionally, self-inductance plays a role in the behavior of the armature, causing voltage to persist even when the armature is aligned with the magnetic field. Understanding these principles is crucial for optimizing motor performance.
highqualityscience
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I recently made a direct current motor with a battery and a magnet. Is it possible for the coil to move in both directions without changing the current or magnetic field? If so, why might the motor work better in one direction?

Homework Equations


F= BIL

The Attempt at a Solution


As far as I know, the movement depends solely on the direction of the field and the direction of the current. It is not possible for the coil to move in 2 directions. Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the armature has two poles then the motor may not start without spinning the shaft first. Try spinning it in both directions.

When the armature coils are moving parallel with the lines of magnetic field flux supplied by the permanent magnets, and no EMF is being self-induced in the armature, that's the point at which you want the commutator to reverse the current.

The magnetic field of the armature will distort the permanent magnet field flux*, and voltage will still be present across the armature terminals even when the armature conductors are moving parallel with field flux because current will try to keep flowing in the armature as the current decreases.

Armature reaction and self-inductance cause the electrical neutral plane to be offset (retarded) with respect to the geometric neutral plane.

*This phenomenon is called armature reaction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top