Direction of rotation of moment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the direction of rotation for a force represented as 400cos45, with participants debating whether it should be considered anticlockwise or clockwise. There is confusion over the terminology, as "anticlockwise" and "counterclockwise" are deemed synonymous. The book's moment sign convention is described as unconventional, with one participant advocating for the right-hand rule, which identifies counterclockwise moments as positive. Ultimately, the participants agree that the moment direction depends on the force's position relative to the axis of rotation, leading to differing interpretations of the book's diagrams. The conversation highlights the importance of consistency in applying moment conventions in calculations.
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


for the 400cos45 force , i think it should rotate anticlockwise, am i right? but the book gave it is rotated counterclockwise...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • DSC_0075[1].JPG
    DSC_0075[1].JPG
    43.9 KB · Views: 378
  • DSC_0076[1].JPG
    DSC_0076[1].JPG
    41 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


for the 400cos45 force , i think it should rotate anticlockwise, am i right? but the book gave it is rotated counterclockwise...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Uhh... "anticlockwise" and "counterclockwise" both mean the same thing, you know, "not clockwise".

RIP, Yogi Berra :cry:
 
SteamKing said:
Uhh... "anticlockwise" and "counterclockwise" both mean the same thing, you know, "not clockwise".

RIP, Yogi Berra :cry:
Typo, imo it should be in counterclockwise, right? The book gave it in clockwise direction..
 
goldfish9776 said:
Typo, imo it should be in counterclockwise, right? The book gave it in clockwise direction..
Nope, guess again.

The moment sign convention adopted by the book is a little unconventional. I prefer the right hand rule, which would make CCW moments positive.
The actual convention chosen doesn't matter, as long as you remain consistent throughout your calculations.
 
Last edited:
SteamKing said:
Nope, guess again.

The moment sign convention adopted by the book is a little unconventional. I prefer the right hand rule, which would make CCW moments positive.
The actual convention chosen doesn't matter, as long as you remain consistent throughout your calculations.
I'm wondering is my direction of 400cos 45 force correct ? Should it point to the left ?
 
SteamKing said:
Nope, guess again.

The moment sign convention adopted by the book is a little unconventional. I prefer the right hand rule, which would make CCW moments positive.
The actual convention chosen doesn't matter, as long as you remain consistent throughout your calculations.
 

Attachments

  • hg.png
    hg.png
    48.9 KB · Views: 439
goldfish9776 said:
I'm wondering is my direction of 400cos 45 force correct ? Should it point to the left ?
Yes, it is correct.
 
SteamKing said:
Yes, it is correct.
then the moment should be anticlockwise , right ? by using right hand rule . I bent my finger from f to F , since it's r cross F
 
goldfish9776 said:
then the moment should be anticlockwise , right ? by using right hand rule . I bent my finger from f to F , since it's r cross F
The moment you showed in Post #6 is indeed CCW.
 
  • #10
SteamKing said:
The moment you showed in Post #6 is indeed CCW.
Ok, then the book is wrong...
 
  • #11
goldfish9776 said:
Ok, then the book is wrong...
No, the moment shown in the book is properly CW.

The figure you drew in Post #6 does not match the layout of forces shown in the book, and the direction of that moment is CCW.

You can't change the position of the force relative to the axis of rotation without changing the direction of the moment which is produced.
 
  • #12
SteamKing said:
No, the moment shown in the book is properly CW.

The figure you drew in Post #6 does not match the layout of forces shown in the book, and the direction of that moment is CCW.

You can't change the position of the force relative to the axis of rotation without changing the direction of the moment which is produced.
I m confused now. Then can you show mew the r x f diagram in the book? I have no idea at all.
 
  • #13
goldfish9776 said:
I m confused now. Then can you show mew the r x f diagram in the book? I have no idea at all.
It's Fig. 3-27(a). Point A is located about half way up the y-axis, while the 400 N force is located about 0.8m from the origin.

You don't need a lot of diagrams and whatnot to figure this out. If point A is the point about which a force causes rotation, you should be able to visualize this from a picture if you can see where the force is applied relative to point A.
 
  • #14
SteamKing said:
It's Fig. 3-27(a). Point A is located about half way up the y-axis, while the 400 N force is located about 0.8m from the origin.

You don't need a lot of diagrams and whatnot to figure this out. If point A is the point about which a force causes rotation, you should be able to visualize this from a picture if you can see where the force is applied relative to point A.
since the author assume clockwise as positive here , so shouldn't the positive 400cos45 (0.3) rotate anticlockwise? i have drawn a diagram for the moment in the previous post , showing it is rotated in anticlockwise direction... i can't understand why the moment is in clockwise direction for the author...
 
Back
Top