Direction of secondary wavefronts from the point sources

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of secondary wavefronts originating from point sources. It questions why these wavefronts are not considered to propagate backward in the direction of the original wave. The response clarifies that while one could theoretically analyze wavefronts in that manner, doing so for every point in space leads to cancellations of contributions. The complexity of the setup affects the overall understanding of wave propagation. Ultimately, the direction of secondary wavefronts is typically analyzed based on their forward propagation rather than backward.
shivam01anand
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My question is simple.

Homework Equations



Why do we not take the direction of secondary wavefronts from the point sources to be going backwards to the original direction of the wave as a whole?

The Attempt at a Solution



Thanks to you! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do that, but then you have to do it at every point in space, and as a result those contributions usually* cancel each other.

*you did not give the setup, so it is hard to tell
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top