Dirty snow (snirt) & melting point

AI Thread Summary
Dirty snow, or "snirt," accumulates on roads and often remains until late spring due to its composition and density. The mixture of dirt and exhaust makes it darker, which theoretically should enhance melting, but it actually becomes harder and more compacted. This packing occurs from snow plows pushing snow into layers, creating denser masses that take longer to melt. Additionally, repeated thawing and freezing cycles further complicate the melting process for this roadside snow. Overall, the combination of density, layering, and environmental factors contributes to the prolonged presence of dirty snow.
Mephisto
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
You know that dirty disgusting snow that accumulates on sides of roads over the winter, and then doesn't melt until well into May or something? Why is it that this snow refuses to melt? It mixes with dirt and exhaust fumes from the cars, and somehow becomes really hard and un-meltable.

Does anyone have an explanation? Its much darker, so it should absorb light much more easily and melt even faster! Its a puzzle :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought the dirty snow left in May was simply what was left of the highest and most shaded snow banks of the previous winter. I have no reason to assume a different melting rate for the late snow I see in my area.
 
If it's not in the sun, it absorbs heat via convection, which is a pretty slow process. I have some fresh looking snow on my deck that never seems to melt.
 
I think due to snow plows pushing the snow to the burm, many times, you have a layered effect and snow is "packed" thus denser relative to soft fallen snow around the packed snow..all things are relative and it takes mucho time to melt a packed snow mass..
also there may be severla thawing freezing cycles for the curb side snow pack and will make melting more difficult
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top