Discover the Frequency of an Echo Using the Doppler Effect - Solved!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the frequency of an echo received by a bat using the Doppler Effect. The bat emits a chirp at 20 kHz while flying at 4.0 m/s, and the frequency received by the wall is calculated to be approximately 20.2346 kHz. After reflection, the frequency received by the bat is determined to be around 20.469 kHz. Participants clarify the correct setup of equations and the significance of sound wave inversion upon reflection. The final calculations confirm the correct approach to solving the problem, highlighting the nuances of Doppler Effect equations.
Dreams2Knight
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Doppler Effect?

Homework Statement



A bat flying at 4.0 m/s emits a chirp at 20 kHz. If this sound pulse is reflected by a wall, what is the frequency of the echo received by the bat?

Homework Equations



Not sure. Do I use the f(1)=f*[(v+/-observer velocity)/(v+/-source velocity)]

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure where to start. I seem to remember something about sound waves being returned inverted if they hit a wall. Does this factor in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dreams2Knight,

As a first step, if the bat emits at a frequency of 20 kHz, what frequency does the wall receive?

After you have that, the reflection is handled by treating the wall as a source. What do you get?
 
alphysicist said:
Hi Dreams2Knight,

As a first step, if the bat emits at a frequency of 20 kHz, what frequency does the wall receive?

After you have that, the reflection is handled by treating the wall as a source. What do you get?

Hello,

Thank you for replying.

Source: Bat
Observer: Wall
For the first equation I have f(1)=20[345/(345-4)] which is 20.23460411 kHz


Source: Wall
Observer: Bat
For the second equation I have f(1)=20[(345+4)/345] which is 20.23188406 kHz

Are my equations correct? If so, does the second equation give me my answer, or do I have to do something else?
 
The bat emits sound at a frequency at 20 kHz, but the wall does not. After reflection from the wall, what frequency does the sound have? That number is the source frequency f on the right hand side. What do you get?
 
alphysicist said:
The bat emits sound at a frequency at 20 kHz, but the wall does not. After reflection from the wall, what frequency does the sound have? That number is the source frequency f on the right hand side. What do you get?

Ok, so if I understand correctly, I need to set my equation up like this:

20.234=f(2)*[(345+4)/345]. This gives me 20.00209.

I confused myself at this point because when I put the numbers into my calculator, I accidently subtracted 4 from 345 instead of adding. Doing that gave me the right answer of 20.46 kHz. I was confused because I thought if the source was still, you used V+V(observor) on top, yet subtracting gave me the right answer.

Then I remembered my teacher mentioning sound waves being inverted when they hit a wall. So, I took the reciprocal of (345+4)/345 and divided 20.234 by that and also got the right answer.

So, did I have my equation set up correctly as 20.234=f(2)*[(345+4)/345]? Was taking the reciprocal of (345+4)/345 also the correct thing to do?
 
No, not quite. It's giving close to the right answer, but I think the way it should be set up is:

step 1: frequency received by wall:
<br /> f = 20 \frac{345}{345 -4} = 20.2346<br />

step 2: frequency received by bat:


<br /> f = (20.2346) \frac{345 + 4}{345} = 20.469<br />


Your other ways get close to the answer becuase, for example 1+x is close to 1/(1-x) when x is small compared to one.
 
alphysicist said:
No, not quite. It's giving close to the right answer, but I think the way it should be set up is:

step 1: frequency received by wall:
<br /> f = 20 \frac{345}{345 -4} = 20.2346<br />

step 2: frequency received by bat:


<br /> f = (20.2346) \frac{345 + 4}{345} = 20.469<br />


Your other ways get close to the answer becuase, for example 1+x is close to 1/(1-x) when x is small compared to one.


Ah, I see my mistake now. Thanks so much for your help. I really appreciate it.
 
Back
Top