Discover the Heat of Combustion of Methane (CH4) Using Bond Energies

AI Thread Summary
The heat of combustion for methane (CH4) is debated, with a commonly cited experimental value of -890 KJ/mol, while users in the discussion calculate -794 KJ/mol using specific bond energies. The balanced equation for combustion is CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + 2H2O. Participants note discrepancies in bond energy values, suggesting that inaccuracies in these values could lead to different results. Corrections to the bond energies provided indicate that some commonly used figures may not align with experimental data. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate bond energy values in calculating thermodynamic properties.
Chocolaty
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Determine the heat of combustion of methane (CH4(g)) by writing a balanced equation and using the bond energies indicated below.

C--H = 414 KJ/mol
O==O = 502 KJ/mol
C==O = 799 KJ/mol
O--H = 464 KJ/mol
________________

I've googled it and apparently the answer is -890 KJ/mol but when I calculate it it gives me -794 KJ/mol. I must be doing something wrong :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm getting -794 KJ/mol as well. You googled the experimental value of the Heat of Combustion of methane? Maybe the difference is because the bond energies used are not fully accurate.
 
CH_4 + 2O_2 -> CO_2 + 2H_2O
change in energy content = 2*799 + 2*2*464 - (4*414 + 2*502) = -794KJ/mol
:smile: same
any1 to point out what's wrong?
 
well, your bond energies also do not agree.
see red corrections below:
Chocolaty said:
Determine the heat of combustion of methane (CH4(g)) by writing a balanced equation and using the bond energies indicated below.

C--H = 414 KJ/mol 415.2[/color]
O==O = 502 KJ/mol 390.2[/color]
C==O = 799 KJ/mol 746.7[/color]
O--H = 464 KJ/mol 438.1[/color]
________________

I've googled it and apparently the answer is -890 KJ/mol but when I calculate it it gives me -794 KJ/mol. I must be doing something wrong :S
check below for details:
http://members.nuvox.net/~on.jwclymer/rq/hoctable.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top