Discover the Roots of Polynomials: Solving Equations and Finding Values of S_n

  • Thread starter Thread starter rock.freak667
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the polynomial equation x^3 - x - 1 = 0 and demonstrating that its roots, α, β, and γ, relate to the roots of the transformed equation y^3 - 2y^2 + y - 1 = 0 through the substitution y = x^2. Participants clarify that the task is to show that the roots of the original equation also satisfy the new equation, rather than finding new roots. The conversation touches on the use of the Rational Root Theorem and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, emphasizing that these tools are unnecessary for the current problem. Overall, the focus is on understanding the relationship between the roots of the two equations rather than solving for new roots. The discussion concludes with a consensus that the problem is simpler than initially perceived.
rock.freak667
Homework Helper
Messages
6,221
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



The roots of the equation x^3-x-1=0 are \alpha,\beta,\gamma
S_n=\alpha^n +\beta^n +\gamma^n

(i)Use the relation y=x^2 to show that \alpha^2,\beta^2,\gamma^2
are roots of the equation
y^3-2y^2+y-1=0
(ii)Hence, or otherwise find the value of S_4
(iii)Find S_8,S_{12},S_{16}

Homework Equations



\sum \alpha=\frac{-b}{a}<br /> <br /> \<br /> <br /> \sum \alpha\beta=\frac{c}{a}<br /> <br /> \<br /> \sum \alpha\beta\gamma=\frac{-d}{a}

The Attempt at a Solution



Just need help with the first part for now. Using I substituted y=x^2 into the equation they gave me in hopes to get back the original equation but that did not work out. Should I just find the sum of the roots and then the sum of the squares of the roots for the original equation and then find the sum of the roots for the eq'n in y and show that they are equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you permitted to use rational roots theorem, and fundamental theorem of algebra? The way you ask the question gives the impression that you are studying something beyond PreCalculus.
 
You don't need anything deep like that. If y= x2, then it is easy to show that y3- 2y2+ y- 1= x6- 2x4+ x2- 1= (x3-x-1)(x3-x+ 1). Since \alpha, \beta, and \gamma make the first factor 0, they make the entire polynomial 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
You don't need anything deep like that. If y= x2, then it is easy to show that y3- 2y2+ y- 1= x6- 2x4l+ x2- 1= (x3-x-1)(x3-x+ 1). Since \alpha, \beta, and \gamma make the first factor 0, they make the entire polynomial 0.

oh thanks. No wonder I was confused. Shall attempt the other parts in a while.
 
symbolipoint said:
Are you permitted to use rational roots theorem, and fundamental theorem of algebra? The way you ask the question gives the impression that you are studying something beyond PreCalculus.

I later did try what I suggested and found that the typical methods of "College Algebra" did not give ready/quick solutions. I found a real zero of about 1.3244... something, and two complex zeros. I have never before seen that alpha, beta, gamma stuff. Again, what course is that from? Is it something beyond PreCalculus?
 
symbolipoint said:
I later did try what I suggested and found that the typical methods of "College Algebra" did not give ready/quick solutions. I found a real zero of about 1.3244... something, and two complex zeros. I have never before seen that alpha, beta, gamma stuff. Again, what course is that from? Is it something beyond PreCalculus?
You would use "rational roots" theorem and "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" to try to FIND roots to the equation. Here you are already given the roots and want to show that they are roots. It's not as complicated as you seem to think!
 
HallsofIvy said:
You would use "rational roots" theorem and "Fundamental Theorem of Algebra" to try to FIND roots to the equation. Here you are already given the roots and want to show that they are roots. It's not as complicated as you seem to think!

I tried synthetic division for possible roots of +1 and -1, and they gave remainders. I then resorted to a graphing calculator and found a real root (not certain if it is rational or irrational) of about 1.3224. Using this value and again synthetic division, I came to two complex zeros or in any case, just resulting quadratic factor.

I could not pick any better rational values to test. According to the textbook of Precalculus, we pick using factors of the constant term and coefficient of the leading term, the positive and the negative values. These are based on integers.
 
Apparently you simply did not understand what the question was asking! It is obvious, from the "rational root theorem" you cite, that neither of these equations has rational roots! The problem did not ask us to find any rational roots, or find any roots at all. It only asked us to show that roots of one equation must satisfy the other. That true because the given 6th degree polynomial (after substituting x2 for y) has the first 3rd degree polynomial equations as a factor.
 
Back
Top