Discussion on an easy MCQ problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discussion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving two blocks in equilibrium against a wall, where the direction of frictional forces is analyzed. The upward frictional force on the outer block implies a downward frictional force on the inner block, suggesting that the inner block tends to move upwards relative to the outer block. Concerns are raised about the problem's completeness, particularly regarding the unspecified magnitudes of forces and coefficients of friction, especially in scenarios where the weight significantly exceeds the applied force. Despite these concerns, participants agree that the problem provides sufficient information to deduce the direction of friction. The conversation highlights the complexities of static friction and the importance of understanding force relationships in equilibrium situations.
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
Just a few hours ago,I have posted a problem in the homework section.Here I want to discuss a similar problem---I mean the interpretation of the answer of a similar problem.

A block is placed against a vertical wall,and another block is placed against this block.We apply a horizontal external force F on the outer block(which is far from the wall) and the system is in equilibrium.Masses are not known.All the surfaces are rough...but the friction co-eff is(are?) not known.

The question asks to find the direction of frictional force on the outer block by the inner block.By no ambiguity it is upward.

This means the reverse frictional force on the inner block(nearesr to the wall) is downward.This also means relative to the outer block, the inner block tends to move upwards!I wanted to visualize this point in a physical way.

In fact,I want to analyze this point...Note that we can write down the force equations as μ₁F=W+μ₂F where μ₁ is the fr coeff at the wall and μ₂ is the same at the contact of the two blocks...

This means (μ₁-μ₂)F=W and (μ₁-μ₂)=W/F [it should be clear if μ₁=μ₂,we are in trouble.
What if W>>F?

Note that the problem specifies no constraint.but I am wondering of the problem is valid at all if W>>F,because in that case we are at a mess...Normally,μ s are typically of the order of 0.2-0.8...The problem specifies nothing about the relative magnitudes of F,W etc...is not the problem in a sense incomplete?

One can say that we are already told that the sysytem is in equilibrium.So,we are to think like this...

I cannot accept it whole heartedly...if you start looking at the free body diagram of the outer body,you can jump at the correct conclusion about the direction of friction onto it.But if you start from that of the inner body...it will trouble you.And you get the opposite conclusion...

Whatever way may I approach,the final answer should be unambiguous...
Please show me if I am making some mistake...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neelakash said:
The question asks to find the direction of frictional force on the outer block by the inner block.By no ambiguity it is upward.

This means the reverse frictional force on the inner block(nearesr to the wall) is downward.This also means relative to the outer block, the inner block tends to move upwards!I wanted to visualize this point in a physical way.
Very good. Perhaps it's easier to visualize it in reverse: With respect to the inner block, were there no friction between the blocks the outer block would slide down.

In fact,I want to analyze this point...Note that we can write down the force equations as μ₁F=W+μ₂F where μ₁ is the fr coeff at the wall and μ₂ is the same at the contact of the two blocks...
One thing to beware of: When talking about static friction, remember that μ₁F is the maximum possible friction force--but the actual value of the friction could be anything from zero up to that maximum. Static friction is whatever it needs to be to prevent slipping--up to its maximum value. You can't just assume it's equal to μF.

This means (μ₁-μ₂)F=W and (μ₁-μ₂)=W/F [it should be clear if μ₁=μ₂,we are in trouble.
What if W>>F?

Note that the problem specifies no constraint.but I am wondering of the problem is valid at all if W>>F,because in that case we are at a mess...Normally,μ s are typically of the order of 0.2-0.8...The problem specifies nothing about the relative magnitudes of F,W etc...is not the problem in a sense incomplete?
This much is true: μ₂F must be at least as great as the weight of the outer block and μ₁F must be at least as great as the weight of both blocks together. Otherwise equilibrium cannot be had.

But it's often the case that you can make deductions about one aspect of a problem with very little information. So, for what it asks, the problem is "complete"--meaning you have all the information to deduce the answer. You may not have enough information to answer other questions, which may have provided a second route to your first answer.

(What does MCQ stand for?)
 
One thing to beware of: When talking about static friction, remember that μ₁F is the maximum possible friction force--but the actual value of the friction could be anything from zero up to that maximum

Yes,you are correct,I seemed to forget this.So,the upward friction must be equal to the total force,but not necessarily μ₁F.Much of my confusion came from the expression of
(μ₁-μ₂)...

I do not know the full name of MCQ but it would be nice if the problem could be done from the inner block...
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top