Distance between each double-slit and the light band.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to Young's double-slit experiment, specifically focusing on the distance between the slits and the resulting light bands. Participants express confusion about how to apply the double-slit equation, nλL=dx, and the relationship between the distances involved in the setup. One contributor highlights the importance of understanding the term d sin θ, which represents the path length difference between light rays from the two slits. They emphasize that for constructive interference, the equation d sin θ = n λ is crucial. Overall, the conversation aims to clarify the application of these equations to arrive at the correct solution for the problem.
RProgrammer
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3118/photo1587hx4.jpg
This #74 is on the SAT Practice Subject Test in Physics, which is also the Physics test administered in January 2003.


Homework Equations


I don't even know how to begin this problem.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know Young's double-slit equation: nλL=dx
But I don't know any equation for the 'x' and 'y' in the diagram, the distance from the actual slits to the band other than the Pythagorean theorem.
I tried solving with those, and I get a difference, but it's not one of the provided answers.
In my attempt I called the slits A (top) and B (bottom) (since 'x' is the fringe distance), and the distances (x and y in the diagram) Za and Zb.
The system of equations I tried to manipulate was:
Za2=L2 + (d/2 - x)2
Zb2=L2 + (d/2 + x)2
nλL=dx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
RProgrammer said:

Homework Statement



This #74 is on the SAT Practice Subject Test in Physics, which is also the Physics test administered in January 2003.


Homework Equations


I don't even know how to begin this problem.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know Young's double-slit equation: nλL=dx

That is the double slit equation for small angles; the original double slit equation is:

<br /> d \sin\theta= n \lambda<br />

Look at how this equation was derived in your textbook; what does d\sin\theta represent?
 
I don't have a textbook, I'm just going over the questions I missed online.
I've gotten all of them except this one. If you could just point me in the right direction, I would be most grateful.
 
RProgrammer said:
I don't have a textbook, I'm just going over the questions I missed online.
I've gotten all of them except this one. If you could just point me in the right direction, I would be most grateful.

Look at the diagram at the top of this page (just ignore the lens in the middle of the diagram):

http://www.physics.hmc.edu/courses/Ph51/two_slit.html

Right next to the slits, you can see a part labeled d\sin\theta. If you consider that part, you can see that d\sin\theta is how much more that one light ray has to travel than the other; it's that path length difference between the two paths.

For constructive interference (maximum intensity), the equation that describes it is the one in my last post: d\sin\theta = n \lambda. Putting both of these things together, do you see what the answer to the problem is now?
 
Thank you, this helps a lot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top