Distance of GJ 436b to GJ 436 - doesn't work out.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ikon Rahu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exoplanet Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distance of exoplanet GJ 436b from its parent star, with a claim that it is 33 times closer than Earth is to the Sun. The original article states GJ 436b is less than 2 million miles away, which contradicts calculations based on the Earth-Sun distance. It is noted that the correct semi-major axis of GJ 436b's orbit is approximately 2.7 million miles, suggesting a potential typo in the NASA press release that has been propagated by other sources. The inconsistency highlights the importance of verifying scientific claims across multiple reputable sources. Accurate data is crucial for understanding exoplanetary distances and their implications.
Ikon Rahu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In an article on phys.org [http://phys.org/news/2015-06-red-dwarf-planet-hydrogen-massive.html] , it states that the exoplanet GJ 436b is 33x closer to its parent star than the Earth is to our sun. It also states that the exoplanet is less than 2 million miles away from the star. If I assume an average distance of 93 million miles (earth-sun), then 1/33rd that yields nearly 3 million miles. Less than 2 million miles would yield a value approximately 48x closer than the earth-sun distance. What am I assuming incorrectly?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Ikon Rahu said:
What am I assuming incorrectly?
You are assuming the article is correct. That phys.org article is a word-for-word copy of http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard...h-bleeding-atmosphere-around-a-warm-exoplanet .

When you look at other sites, and even better, in scientific journals (e.g., http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.2778), GJ 436b's orbit has a semi-major axis of 0.0291 au, or 2.7 million miles. The easiest explanation is that there's a typo in the NASA press release, and that this typo was copied over and over without question by sites such as phys.org.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top