Distance traveled by a accelerating truck with steel load.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum stopping distance for a truck carrying a heavy steel load to prevent the load from sliding forward. Given a truck mass of 20,000 kg and a load of 10,000 kg moving at 12.0 m/s with a static friction coefficient of 0.500, the key concern is the risk of the load crushing the cab during sudden stops. Participants emphasize that the acceleration of the load must match the truck's acceleration to avoid sliding. The correct stopping distance, derived from the calculations, is determined to be 14.7 meters. Understanding the forces at play and applying Newton's laws are crucial for solving this problem effectively.
blackkeys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Distance traveled by an accelerating truck with a steel load. With a twist!

Homework Statement



Consider a large truck carrying a heavy load such as steel beams. A significant hazard for the driver is that the load may slide forward crushing the cab, if the truck stops suddenly in an accident or even in braking. Assume, for example, that a 10,000kg load sits on the flat bed of a 20,000kg truck moving at 12.0m/s. Assume the load is not tied down to the truck and has a coefficient of static friction of 0.500 with the truck bed. Calculate the minimum stopping distance for which the load will not slide forward relative to the truck.

Homework Equations



Fsf is less then or equal to the coefficient of static friction * (mass * gravity)

A= (velocity final - velocity initial) / (total time)

change in x = original velocity in the x direction + acceleration in the x direction * time


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that both masses of the beams and truck are not relevant to the solution to the problem. However that's all I've been able to figure out. I think that if the truck is moving at 12m/s the bars must be resisting motion at 12m/s. Is this true? I wasn't sure which direction to go after determining that mass wasn't going to be any help. How could I use this to help solve the problem?

The solution to the problem is 14.7m
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
blackkeys said:

Homework Statement



Consider a large truck carrying a heavy load such as steel beams. A significant hazard for the driver is that the load may slide forward crushing the cab, if the truck stops suddenly in an accident or even in braking. Assume, for example, that a 10,000kg load sits on the flat bed of a 20,000kg truck moving at 12.0m/s. Assume the load is not tied down to the truck and has a coefficient of static friction of 0.500 with the truck bed. Calculate the minimum stopping distance for which the load will not slide forward relative to the truck.

Homework Equations



Fsf is less then or equal to the coefficient of static friction * (mass * gravity)

A= (velocity final - velocity initial) / (total time)

change in x = original velocity in the x direction + acceleration in the x direction * time


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that both masses of the beams and truck are not relevant to the solution to the problem. However that's all I've been able to figure out. I think that if the truck is moving at 12m/s the bars must be resisting motion at 12m/s. Is this true? I wasn't sure which direction to go after determining that mass wasn't going to be any help. How could I use this to help solve the problem?

The solution to the problem is 14.7m
The acceleration of the beam load must be the same as the truck's acceleration in order for the load not to slide with respect to the truck. You'll need to calculate that acceleration of the load using Newton's 2nd law. The use your kinematic equations...you made in error in one of them for delta x.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top