Divergence and curl rule simplification?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Durato
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Divergence
Durato
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Just for reference, i got this question from reading an online ebook:
http://www.plasma.uu.se/CED/Book/EMFT_Book.pdf
The bottom equation on page 24 is where i these equations came up.

I have been reading some stuff and i keep coming across an annotation which looks exactly
like a divergence symbol except backwards.
V dot (del sign)

Specifically, it was used as follows:
[j(x') dot del']del'(1/(abs(x-x')))

where del is the upside triangle symbol and x and x' are just two different variables.
del' operates only on the x' symbol.

Also, can anyone point me out to any online reference which shows how to simplify
vector identities which include integrals. Example:

Homework Statement



Simplify Kcurl(curl(integral(d^3x'*j(x')/abs(x-x'))))
where, again, x and x' are two independent variables and d^3x' just represent the volume
differential (not a variable!)

Homework Equations


curl(curl(a)) = grad(div(a))-laplace(a)

The Attempt at a Solution


No clue where to start. But their solution was as follows:
= -K*(integral(d^3x'j(x')laplace(1/(abs(x-x'))))
+K*(integral(d^3x'[j(x') dot del']grad'(1/(abs(x-x')))))

where del' or grad' just means do in terms of x' variable.

I got lost when they started using grad' and dot del' in the second integral, even though
they had used a curl in terms of x, not x'.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del

That should take care of your first concern. Apropos your second concern, the integral seems to be acting like a scalar.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top