Understanding Division in Index Notation

AI Thread Summary
Division in index notation can be confusing, particularly regarding summation. When an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation, no summation is involved; a free index must remain free on both sides. The expression a = 1/b_i is nonsensical, while a = 1/b_{ii} is valid. The equation a_i = b_i/c_{jj} can be interpreted correctly with summation over j. Understanding these rules clarifies the use of division in index notation.
sinad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Recently I started to use index notation, but still the division is not clear for me. I'll mention just some simple examples that I'm not sure about:

Does a =\frac{1}{b_i} mean that a = \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{1}{b_i} or a = 1 / \sum_{i = 1}^{3}b_i ?

Similarly, does a_i =\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}} mean that a_i = \sum_{j=1}^{3}\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}} or a = b_i / \sum_{j = 1}^{3}c_{jj} ?

thanks beforehand!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, a = 1/b_i is a nonsensical expression.

a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj} is fine, however. Divisions don't come up very often with vector quantities, though.
 
Muphrid said:
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, a = 1/b_i is a nonsensical expression.

Indeed, I'm sorry, what I wanted to write is a = 1/b_{ii}

Muphrid said:
a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj} is fine

thanks! it is clear now.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top