Medical How Does DNA Separation Work in Cheek Swab Tests?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna Test
AI Thread Summary
DNA tests from cheek swabs are effective despite the presence of bacteria in the mouth. The key to accurate results lies in the use of PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) with specific primers that target human DNA, effectively minimizing contamination from bacteria. These primers are designed to be human-specific, focusing on conserved loci in the human genome. Additionally, concerns about contamination from food are acknowledged, but the specificity of the primers helps ensure that only human DNA is amplified during testing.
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
623
DNA tests can now be done from a cheek swab. But since our mouths are full of bacteria, how is that DNA separated from human DNA?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Simply put, generally it is not. But for the tests you perform a PCR using specific primers so that bacterial contamination is not an issue.
 
Are those primers human-specific?

I'm guessing it's not only bacteria that could contaminate a cheek swab, but food could, as well. It would be quite surprising to take a DNA test and find that you're the offspring of celery and a cow :smile: .
 
Yes they are. To be precise they are specific to certain conserved loci in the human genome.
 
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-deadliest-spider-in-the-world-ends-lives-in-hours-but-its-venom-may-inspire-medical-miracles-48107 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versutoxin#Mechanism_behind_Neurotoxic_Properties https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0028390817301557 (subscription or purchase requred) he structure of versutoxin (δ-atracotoxin-Hv1) provides insights into the binding of site 3 neurotoxins to the voltage-gated sodium channel...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
Back
Top