Do all cases of Newton's third law follow both the strong and weak forms?

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Newton's third law

Homework Statement


My book gives two forms of Newton's Third Law:
Weak Form: The forces exerted by two particles \alpha and \beta on each other are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction
Strong Form: The forces exerted by two particles \alpha and \beta on each other, in addition to being equal and oppositive, must lie on the straight line joining the two particles.

Here are my questions:
1) Is it true that there are cases IN WHICH BOTH THE STRONG FORM AND THE WEAK FORM FAIL TO HOLD?
2) My book says that for example, magnetic forces, those forces exerted on a moving charge q in a magnetic field \mathbf{B} (\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{q}v \times \mathbf{B}), obey the weak form, but not the strong form. I don't understand why that obeys the weak form. What are the two particles?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1.
Consider two identical charges moving along the x and y axes with same speed away from the origin. The electrical forces between them is repulsive, but now just find out how the magnetic forces between them behave. You don't have to calculate -- just roughly think of the charges as currents and find the direction of the associated magnetic fields like we do for currents.

The total force of one on the other is equal to the force of the other on the former, but they are not opposite. So, this violates both weak and strong.

2.
Consider one charge and the wire in which current is flowing that makes the magnetic field B. Or simply a magnet and a charge near one of the poles, moving in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the magnet. The force on the charge is perpendicular to the plane containing B and v. The force on the magnet is opposite, but not collinear. So, the weak form holds.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top